Is “Number” Singular or Plural?
In one of my posts, I found I had written “There is a significant number of sources…”. When reading it back to myself, I kept wanting to change the “is” to “are”, but I think the way I have it is actually more grammatically correct, even though it sounds odd to my ears. Am I right in thinking that I wrote it correctly the first time?
The noun number by itself is singular:
The number on his jersey is 88.
The number of unemployed has risen.
However, the phrase a number of calls for a plural verb:
A number of protesters were arrested.
There are a significant number of sources.
Tony’s experience is an example of what linguist Noam Chomsky meant when he argued that
the intuition of a native speaker is enough to define the grammaticalness of a sentence; that is, if a particular string of English words elicits a double take, or feeling of wrongness in a native English speaker, it can be said that the string of words is ungrammatical (when various extraneous factors affecting intuitions are controlled for).
Obviously among the “various extraneous factors” must be included sufficient exposure to standard English usage in speech and writing.Recommended for you: « Hippo Words »
Subscribe to Receive our Articles and Exercises via Email
- You will improve your English in only 5 minutes per day, guaranteed!
- Subscribers get access to our exercise archives, writing courses, writing jobs and much more!
- You'll also get three bonus ebooks completely free!
21 Responses to “Is “Number” Singular or Plural?”
What about “variety”? Should the verb in the following be “are” or “is”? “Although a variety of courses are available…”
Tadpole: afraid I disagree with you there… I agree with the statement that: “prepositional phrase … should be able to be removed wihtout affecting the rest of the sentence”, but from this it surely follows that “a number of” is the prepositional phrase to be removed.
Removing “of protesters” leaves us with “a number was arrested”, which is clearly meaningless as a number is a mathematical construct, and it is not possible to arrest a number!
However, removing “a number of” leaves us with “the protesters were arrested”, which makes sense and is grammatically correct.
I feel that this article is misleading. There is proper english and there is *the english that most of us speak*. I am not making any value judgements at all, but I think there should be some regard for the rules. Number is a singular, numbers is plural. As such, the one would say, “A number of the protestors was arrested”. As stated above by someone else, “of protestors” is a prepositional phrase, and should be able to be removed wihtout affecting the rest of teh sentence. It might sound *wrong*, but that doesn’t make it wrong.
None of the triangles IS black. (one may want to say ARE, but that is incorrect)
I guess I must simply say I think the author of teh article is wrong in saying that certain uses of nouns would affect if they are singular or plural.
PreciseEdit (or whoever can help),
Regarding “all of”: what if there are multiple uncountable objects?
“All of the food and water is/are mine.”
“All of the research and writing is/are mine.”
“All of the research and writing is/are my own work.”
I believe this is a matter of American vs. British English. I agree with Cassie that it is preferable to use a singular verb with “the number” in American English.
Regarding “explanation of” and “explanation on.”
“Explanation on” is not standard usage. I have never heard “on” used with “explanation.” Likewise, “explanation to” is incorrect.
You can have an explanation of something, an explanation for something, and an explanation about something.
But not “explanation on.”
Hope that helps.
I have a question concerning the use of “explanation of” versus “explanation on”. I’m more accustomed to hearing “explanation of”, but internet search results show that “explanation on” is sometimes used also. Is there a distinction in meaning between the two different phrases? Is there any reference source that provides guidance as to when “explanation of” should be used versus “explanation on”?
@Steve, thank you for your answer. I appreciate it.
@hanan: Yes, it is correct to say “Was it the water balloons?”, because “it” refers to the cause, which is singular, and not to the plural water balloons.
Could anyone help me in this:
“What was the cause of all this? Was it the fire? Was it the water baloons?”
Is it correct to say “was it the water baloons”?
My son is driving me crazy!!!! He consistently says ” I need to do a few stuff. ” I reply that he should properly say ” I need to do a few things ” or ” I need to do some stuff “. I know my options are fine, but my question is whether his version is also proper. Please help us !!
k_anish: Your teacher is correct. “Stuffs” (used as a noun) is not a word.
Further explanation on whether “number” takes a plural or singular verb:
“The number of” is a singular collective noun and requires a singular verb.
“The number of unemployed U.S. workers is steadily increasing.”
“A number of,” on the other hand, is a plural form and therefore takes the plural verb form.
“A number of unemployed U.S. workers are beginning to feel the crunch.”
Note: I’m adding this to reinforce the rule for myself as well as for other readers. 🙂
I often hear people say Stuffs. But one of my teachers told me, there’s no “s” in stuff.. it’s plural already. So which one is true.. stuffs or stuff
Thanks for this useful addendum.
My take on this:
“A number of . . .” follows the same guidelines as “all of . . . .”
“All of . . .” is plural or singular based on the object of the preposition. Singular object = singular verb. Plural object = plural verb.
Because the object of the preposition for “a number of” will always be plural, we need the plural form of the verb.
“All of the CHANGE IS lost.”
“All of the MEN ARE present”
“A number of MEN ARE present.”
But . . .
“The number of men present is six.”
This is from an English teacher in Argentina:
It’s the idea of “countable” vs. “uncoutable” nouns.
If you can “count” something, like bottles, or books or a number of people. Countable nouns become plural when there’s more than one item.
“Uncountable” nouns are things that you can’s count. Like sky, pride, thunder or sugar (unless you put them into countable quantities, such as a “packet of sugar”).
So, since you can count a significant number of sources, it has to be plural.
A confusion regarding the same was always in my mind also, but now cleared. Thanks for the post!!!
Didn’t know this, always though ‘number’ was singular.
Learn something new every day. Thanks
“Obviously among the ‘various extraneous factors’ must be included sufficient exposure to standard English usage in speech and writing.”
Having read only the brief snippet from Noam Chomsky you included above, I think it is a bit of a leap from “native English speaker” to “native English speaker with sufficient exposure to standard English”. It seems the point is more that “grammaticalness” is a function of the set of native English speakers however they identify themselves. I don’t think most people in that set would exclude themselves for not having sufficient exposure to standard English.
However, the verb should be agreeing with “number” since “of sources” is a prepositional phrase and therefore not the subject of the verb “is”. (Did I do my quotation marks correctly?) Yes?
thanks a lot…this is help me problem solve