Posts By Email
Grab The RSSThe Impotence of Proofreading
Its a fact that a spell checker will not catch all the mistakes on your text. More specifically, it will not catch misspellings that form other valid words.
So how do you solve this problem? Proofreading, of coarse!
Just read again through you’re text trying to spot words that don’t fit, and make sure to not loose the focus while you do it. Proofreading is sometimes more important then using the spell checker itself.
You should proofread virtually any written piece, from emails to blog posts. Proofread your homework as well, since you don’t want to drive the principle of your school crazy.
Let’s be honest, misspelled words are defiantly a sign of ignorance.
The simple act of proofreading will have a great affect on the quality of your material, and I am sure that you’ll earn more complements from people.
Their you go my friend, and take this advice seriously. After all, you don’t want to look dumb in front of the general pubic!
P.S. Can you find all the “mistakes”?
Related Articles
Share
Subscribe By Email And Get A Free eBook!
- Subscribe to Daily Writing Tips and you will be able to download our free ebook: "Basic English Grammar."
- You will also get all our grammar, spelling, punctuation and writing tips.
- The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).
106 Responses to “The Impotence of Proofreading”
Got something to say?
Popular Articles
- 40 Yiddish Words You Should Know
- 10 Rules for Writing Numbers
- Vocabulary Test 1
- Passed vs Past
- Writing a Reference Letter
- Creative Writing 101
- 44 Resume Writing Tips
- Among vs. Amongst
- 6 Foreign Expressions You Should Know
- Let the Word Do the Work
- How to Format a US Business Letter
- That vs. Which
- 50 Incorrect Pronunciations To Avoid
- The Writing Process
- Inquire vs. Enquire
- 25 Pieces of Writing Software
- 12 Greek Words You Should Know
- Cannot or Can Not?
- What Does Sic Mean?
- Wether, Weather, Whether
- 34 Writing Tips To Write Better
- Yours Faithfully or Yours Sincerely?
- Latin Words and Expressions
- Grammar Test 1
- Program vs. Programme
How right you are. I’m not much of a proofreader of my own content, then one day when I’m randomly reading some of it I see terrible mistakes
So I should definitely proofread more often.
No kidding, when you go through older pieces that you’ve written you find a lot of messy stuff.
Here’s a tip I used in graduate school and one I pass along to my students: Read aloud to yourself.
When you proofread silently, you really tend to skim and possibly miss mistakes. But, if you read aloud, there is absolutely no way your mouth can keep up with your brain. Therefore, you have to slow down and you can “hear” your mistakes more easily.
People may give you funny looks, but not when grades come out and you are on top.
Ha! Great post Daniel. I counted eleven proofreading “errors.” Did I miss any?
If you count the title, there are 12
.
Really? I count 13.
You almost had me! As I started reading the first sentence in an entry about self-assessment in writing I thought how ironic it was that the very first word was already a grammatical infraction, ha ha.
Great entry, good fun… keep up the good work.
Great entry. I like the reading aloud idea, and I also read sections and paragraphs out of order, which helps refocus my mind.
For a minute I thought, what is this guy preaching to us for. Then I got the message
Good “articel”.
You had me going for a minute, but then I understood you were actively trying to teach us what proofreading is all about.
For the record, I count 13 errors.
Excellent post. Keep ‘em coming!
Well, I hope you enjoy your newfound search prowess concerning the word “impotence”.
Great article! I laughed all the way through.
Homonym is a headache in medical transcription too! Once while proofreading a file, I ended up with a sentence like this: “He lives with his knees” where as it should be “niece.” Silly isn’t it? No spellchecker could spot it unless you proofread it. Else, our silly mistake is a joke for others.
Oops, “the principle of your school?”
I got 12 errors! A little late on the thread.
Proofreading after a short break, or better yet: a good nite’s sleep, increases the quality of your revisions/corrections, mebelieves.
One way to proofread is to read the text one word at a time, from the last word to the first word in the document written.
Hukd on FonikZ wurcked 4 I.
you haven’t proofread your blog either
HeHe i think that’s b/c you wanted to make a point:)
Owed two a Spell Chequer
Eye halve a spelling chequer; It came with my pea sea; It plainly marques four my revue Miss steaks eye kin knot sea. Eye strike a key and type a word End weight four it two say Weather eye am wrong our write – It shows me straight a weigh. As soon as a mist ache is maid It nose bee fore two long, And eye kin put the arrow rite It’s rare lea ever wrong. Eye have run this poem threw it; I am shore your pleased two no Its letter perfect awl the weigh, My spell chequer tolled me sew!
I think your an outstanding writer, which shows in you’re grammar. Professional proofreaders are fine, but there going to get they’re booty kicked over their, especially if your going to continue writing you’re articles.
“it shows in you’re grammar”. Ha! Very witty (I hope!)
proofreading is all about re ensuring your thoughts rather than correcting grammar and typo.
typo and grammar always put off people
Taylor Mali, the slam poet, has a fantastic track labled “The Impotence of Proof-reading.”
I wonder if that’s where the title came from.
Not just to proof after a break, but better still, get someone else to do it!
I find it’s very hard – almost impossible – to spot my own mistakes but I can see other people’s……
S
I am all about proof reading but what about those crazy typos that just don’t get caught? I double space my writing and then read each paragraph backwards so I can take the sentences out of context but still I hate missing a “no” when it should be “know”.
Lauren, reading backwards is good advice indeed.
I love the purposeful misspellings in the article… It reminds me of reading just about everything I’ve ever read on the internet. I’ve also noticed that a lot of more “reputable” news outlets like the New York Times and Reuters seem to have lost the ability to proofread. Interesting stuff.
I’ve found that a good way to proofread, for spelling mistakes, is to read everything backwards. Similar to how reading out loud forces you to read everything, reading backwards breaks up your flow and really highlights the words by themselves.
“pubic general the of front in dumb look to want don’t you all after”
I love the title of this article!
Psst… The title of your post is also the title of a poem from Taylor Mali, did you snag it from him?
I love the use of their for there, principle for principal, etc. No spell checker will catch those mistakes, nor will every grammar checker do the same.
Kevan, yeah I had seen Taylor Mali’s video a couple of time ago, it served as inspiration.
i’ve reread it several times …
i simply cant seem to find 12 mistakes …
What fun! May I share this with my SAT test-prep students? Most have not quite grasped the idea that there, their and they’re are not interchangeable. Don’t get me started on their pronoun agreement and case.
Sandy, sure
.
Sometimes the first proof reading missed out some mistakes and it takes the 2nd or the 3rd one to get to it
Actually, you need to proofread several times — for different types of errors. Reading backward will usually catch misspellings, but not poor grammar or homonym problems. You have to reread VERY CAREFULLY, from front to back, to check for grammar and syntax errors as well as just plain bad writing.
The best way to proofread, however, is to ask someone else with good writing/spelling/grammar skills to check your writing for you.
Dew knot trussed spell-ing chequers two fined awl yore mist steaks.
When proofreading, a red penis your best friend.
This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title o.us poetry. Thanks for informative article
Hey,
That was fun. I could catch 13 mistakes.wonder if there are more.
Even though the article states there are 13 errors, there are actually 12. My suspicion is that “misspelled” is spelled correctly, and the common misconception is that it is spelled as “mispelled”.
The worst part of not proof reading a piece and then sending it is like sending out a message saying “unprofessional” written all over it. I guess we all need to cultivate this habit.
16
Very funny! I always heated proofreading!
I often find myself cutting and pasting blog comments such as these into an email draft or some other program that at least allows a spell check. It seems like a “word usage checker” for the 500 most common mistakes could also be easily included.
Great Stuff!
Proofreading is the probably one of the more important aspects of writing. It trains you to be more observant and scrutinizing your writing before someone else has the chance to is advised.
General pubic, ha!
good to have tense in your import!
I honestly don’t think I’ve ever proofread anything in my entire life. Sad isn’t it?
Really, 13 mistakes. 12 spelling mistakes including title, plus one missed apostrophe. Several of the spelling mistakes are misuses of words that would be spelled correctly in a different context. I think many people missed “on” in “on your text”. It should be “in”.
(Btw I’m a professional proof-reader, lol.)
Excellent article!
I miss words. Plain and simple. I miss them when I write and I miss them when I proof. When I read my work back to myself, I add words that are not there. There is no known treatment.
Therefore, I use a sofware reader called ReadPlease with a high quality AT&T voice. When I “listen” to my writing and follow along with the text on the monitor, I can “hear” the missed words. Is this an extra step? Yes. Does it prevent mistakes. Yes. Is it worth it? Yes.
For me, I’d like to check every one of my article word by word, I don’t like to use check tools because I don’t think they are working very well.
But I still make some mistake sometimes. What I want to do is learning more about using English so I can write it perfectly.
Ugh, the double-edged sword of proof reading.
As a an account handler in an ad agency the “out loud” proof technique was stuffed down my throat. I hated it- every ad, even the pick ups, were read out loud- spaces and punctuation included. It was like a contest to see who could be the most obsessive about double spaces and commas!
And then, reborn as a copywriter, I came to a new agency and found that not only did they not proof out loud, they didn’t proof at all.
Everyone assumes that everyone else:
A) knows how to properly proof
B) will proof the document for them
Suddenly, those years of suffering through long documents read aloud seemed like the good old days…
Moral of my story: Proofing may seem like a pain, but getting it done makes all the difference!
Bree: you’ve got bottle! I don’t know many people who have moved from the accounts to the creatives dept, but well done you. I’m sure you’re a lot more satisfied with your job now.
tila tequila galleries I were ooohs and death threat episode. I ll be any good.
Do you mean the “Importance” (not “Impotence”) of proofreading?
Having taken secretarial and business training in college, I feel that I am a pretty fair editor. I have noticed something in your writing and others lately and wonder if it is something new since my education in 1950. That something is putting only one space at the end of a sentence. I was taught to put two spaces. what do you thinK?
proofread to eliminate errors when writing something
, i do love writing my ideas about something but i never thougth that it would affect somehow if theres errors in it 
why did you call it the impotence of proofreading?.i think it should be the importance
One point that many writers don’t understand is that writing and proofreading require different skills, a different frame of mind. Writing is creative with some technical skills, and proofreading is technical with some creativity.
Perhaps another point is that the work is very tedious and intensive. As such, one quick proofread of any document is probably not enough. We were finding too many missed errors during our quality control processes and finally had to institute a 3-part proofreading process: On screen, on paper, on screen. Once that processes is completed, we still have to perform quality control, and we still find the occasional error. With a goal of fewer than one mistake per 50 pages, one quick proofreading pass through a document simply won’t suffice.
I dunno about the ‘reading backwards’ thing…I tried it and just got more confused.
“!cibup lareneg eht fo tnorf ni bmud kool ot tnaw t’nod uoy ,lla retfA” ???
Heck, that ALL looks like mistakes to me! (Well, except for “kool”)
I try to give stuff a day or two to ‘ripen’. By then, I can focus on the reading as if someone else had written the material … and something usually has begun to stink.
I can still let ‘thinkos’ get by me, but I’m able to bring my limited grammar vocabulary to bear. Oddly enough, once the grammatical errors have been cleared away, the ‘thinkos’ show up better.
I have one other rule — a process, actually. I write as concisely as I can. Then I summarily toss 2/3 of the material and rearrange the rest more logically. Then I edit the beast with a red pencil in hand, looking for phrases and entire sentences which are not required to tell the story. They are there. Just to keep the process from being entirely linear, I will also add, delete and add and delete fresh sentences … sometimes the exact same sentence will make an appearance several times before I’ll realize that I really do need to say it — in another piece.
After a couple iterations of this, I’m ready to let someone else proofread it for me. I try to pick someone who doesn’t much like me but has a definite respect for the English language. Unfortunately, I know no one fitting this description.
I’ve resisted the temptation to engage in ‘manglish’. This really IS the sort of writing I start with. Darn you, Admiral Halsey!
@ karl — oh, never mind.
Eye though tit looked prefectly awl wright.
I’d be happy just looking at the general pubic. The possibilities are endless…
Reading aloud for proofreading: I’ve been doing it instinctively for a long time. I sound like a third grader – I usually read that slowly – but it works for all the reasons you say it does. I can attest to its usefullness (2 ‘ls’?). Great tip!
Lorraine,
With computer typing the new style is one space. In typing on a typewriter it is two full spaces or was when I was a girl.
I found 17 errors in style, grammar and spelling.
Speaking of mistakes. Of coarse?
Great article and great responses.
I like to have my Macintosh computer read my text. I often end up doing the repeated word thing and it catches those as well as words like impotence.
I agree with Jon that getting your computer to read things out loud can be a real eye-opener! As earlier commenters have pointed out, it’s very easy to read what you thought you wrote – not what you wrote. Reading it out loud yourself can start to get over that – but getting someone else – or, in the case of the computer, something else! to read it out loud can really help.
Crap! i missed ‘impotance’ .. i should beat myself to death!
I got 7 on first try. 12 on second. Who’s on third.
Although no spell checker is perfect, I have learned a lot about spelling by just spell checking, and r-e-a-d-i-n-g the way the spell checker spells.
As for my background, I got an “A” in spelling. In the first grade. In the fifth and sixth, “D’s”. My spell checker saved me. This was written without a spell checker. As are all my posts to blogs. But when I write in my own blog, I check.
As an experienced proofreader, I find spell checking software quite useful for ‘clearing the decks’ before I begin proofreading in earnest. Relying on said software, however, is fatal.
An increasingly common error is the ‘of/have confusion’. For example, “I should of locked the front door” instead of “I should have locked the front door”. Spell checking software is powerless to spot this kind of thing.
Hemingway rewrote the last page of A Farewell to Arms 39 times. It’s not just about proofreading for grammar and punctuation, but for content and style as well. Don’t get so caught up in where the comma goes that you don’t even realize that the document doesn’t meet your quality standards to begin with. This comment has grammatical errors in it as well, but you still get the meaning–which is most important.
believing that „misspelled words are defiantly a sign of ignorance” might be a sign of ignorance. What are you ignoring when you are so sure?
When proofreading from paper I use a clean sheet of paper to cover all the lines except the one I’m reading. This exposes only one line at a time, which helps me focus fully on it. It really helps spot both spelling and sentence construction errors.
Thanks guys for sharing this informative information.