The Impotence of Proofreading

By Daniel Scocco

proofreading.gifIts a fact that a spell checker will not catch all the mistakes on your text. More specifically, it will not catch misspellings that form other valid words.

So how do you solve this problem? Proofreading, of coarse!

Just read again through you’re text trying to spot words that don’t fit, and make sure to not loose the focus while you do it. Proofreading is sometimes more important then using the spell checker itself.

You should proofread virtually any written piece, from emails to blog posts. Proofread your homework as well, since you don’t want to drive the principle of your school crazy.

Let’s be honest, misspelled words are defiantly a sign of ignorance.

The simple act of proofreading will have a great affect on the quality of your material, and I am sure that you’ll earn more complements from people.

Their you go my friend, and take this advice seriously. After all, you don’t want to look dumb in front of the general pubic!

P.S. Can you find all the “mistakes”?

Recommended for you: « »
Improve your English: « Subscribe to our posts and exercises »



88 Responses to “The Impotence of Proofreading”

  • Cheryl B

    Touche!! I was drinking a diet pepsi when I read this. Huge mistake!! I spit all over my keyboard!! Touche. Bravo. I am an executive recruiter who types like a 2nd grader. I have sent more garbage out to CEO’s and other exec types than I care to admit. I was even considering scheduling an appointment with a neurologist. No need, I just need to PROOFREAD ALL communication/s and wait a few minute and proofread again and then hit the send button!!!! I can still see my embosses face a year ago when I sent something to him and he waited until the next day to show it to me. Just God awful. I have worked hard to be self employed and do not want to appear like a hillbilly any longer.

  • Vinayak Gadkari

    Excellent article, the article had me for a minute!

    Proof reading is the final check. A simple VB script (see below) can be used to do this final check while sending out an important document or email.

    ‘ Speaks text passed on command line
    Dim sapi
    set sapi = CreateObject(“sapi.spvoice”)
    sapi.Speak WScript.Arguments.Item(0)

  • Louise Robinson

    OK this isn’t a new article but will remain relevant for a long time to come. I am so passionate about proofreading that I now offer a simple and affordable option for the sole trader. It’s not just typos and spelling errors. It’s making sure it reads right and there is consistency of style. Can’t afford a proofreading service – you can’t afford not to 🙂

  • kalpanaceo

    I like this post. One day i search a topic Proofreading service company, that time i find a company Informatics Outsourcing. They are providing the best service with Affordable price.

  • Editing service

    Gotta love this!

  • Neil

    To anyone who couldn’t find the 12 mistakes they are:

    Impotence = Importance
    Its = It’s
    coarse = course
    you’re = your
    loose = lose
    then = than
    principle = principal
    defiantly = definitely
    affect = effect
    complements = compliments
    Their = there
    pubic = public

  • transcribe

    Yes, proofreading by an expert ensures zero mistakes. Mistakes, whether spelling or grammar gives a wrong impression. That’s why every transcript should be checked by proofreaders.

  • Pete

    Great article! Being a professional proofreader myself this is information I find very informative.

  • Jim Powell

    Nice illustration! We all know how important first impressions are but often forget this fact when writing in a hurry. Take your time. Proofreading can actually be fun and therefore even more effective. Involve others and make it a regular habit.

  • Kevin

    Thanks guys for sharing this informative information.

  • Shiv

    When proofreading from paper I use a clean sheet of paper to cover all the lines except the one I’m reading. This exposes only one line at a time, which helps me focus fully on it. It really helps spot both spelling and sentence construction errors.

  • ioan nicut

    believing that „misspelled words are defiantly a sign of ignorance” might be a sign of ignorance. What are you ignoring when you are so sure? 🙂

  • John Carraway

    Hemingway rewrote the last page of A Farewell to Arms 39 times. It’s not just about proofreading for grammar and punctuation, but for content and style as well. Don’t get so caught up in where the comma goes that you don’t even realize that the document doesn’t meet your quality standards to begin with. This comment has grammatical errors in it as well, but you still get the meaning–which is most important.

  • Mike Sellars

    As an experienced proofreader, I find spell checking software quite useful for ‘clearing the decks’ before I begin proofreading in earnest. Relying on said software, however, is fatal.

    An increasingly common error is the ‘of/have confusion’. For example, “I should of locked the front door” instead of “I should have locked the front door”. Spell checking software is powerless to spot this kind of thing.

  • Baruch Atta

    I got 7 on first try. 12 on second. Who’s on third.
    Although no spell checker is perfect, I have learned a lot about spelling by just spell checking, and r-e-a-d-i-n-g the way the spell checker spells.
    As for my background, I got an “A” in spelling. In the first grade. In the fifth and sixth, “D’s”. My spell checker saved me. This was written without a spell checker. As are all my posts to blogs. But when I write in my own blog, I check.

  • Dee

    Crap! i missed ‘impotance’ .. i should beat myself to death!

  • Emma

    I agree with Jon that getting your computer to read things out loud can be a real eye-opener! As earlier commenters have pointed out, it’s very easy to read what you thought you wrote – not what you wrote. Reading it out loud yourself can start to get over that – but getting someone else – or, in the case of the computer, something else! to read it out loud can really help.

  • Jon Boyd Ann Arbor real estate Exclusive Buyer’s Agent

    Great article and great responses.

    I like to have my Macintosh computer read my text. I often end up doing the repeated word thing and it catches those as well as words like impotence.

  • Alice

    Speaking of mistakes. Of coarse?

  • Carson Buckingham

    I found 17 errors in style, grammar and spelling.

  • Sheila

    Lorraine,
    With computer typing the new style is one space. In typing on a typewriter it is two full spaces or was when I was a girl.

  • Bill Cooney

    Reading aloud for proofreading: I’ve been doing it instinctively for a long time. I sound like a third grader – I usually read that slowly – but it works for all the reasons you say it does. I can attest to its usefullness (2 ‘ls’?). Great tip!

  • Cory

    I’d be happy just looking at the general pubic. The possibilities are endless…

  • cmdweb

    Eye though tit looked prefectly awl wright.

  • BillinDetroit

    @ karl — oh, never mind.

  • BillinDetroit

    I try to give stuff a day or two to ‘ripen’. By then, I can focus on the reading as if someone else had written the material … and something usually has begun to stink.

    I can still let ‘thinkos’ get by me, but I’m able to bring my limited grammar vocabulary to bear. Oddly enough, once the grammatical errors have been cleared away, the ‘thinkos’ show up better.

    I have one other rule — a process, actually. I write as concisely as I can. Then I summarily toss 2/3 of the material and rearrange the rest more logically. Then I edit the beast with a red pencil in hand, looking for phrases and entire sentences which are not required to tell the story. They are there. Just to keep the process from being entirely linear, I will also add, delete and add and delete fresh sentences … sometimes the exact same sentence will make an appearance several times before I’ll realize that I really do need to say it — in another piece.

    After a couple iterations of this, I’m ready to let someone else proofread it for me. I try to pick someone who doesn’t much like me but has a definite respect for the English language. Unfortunately, I know no one fitting this description.

    I’ve resisted the temptation to engage in ‘manglish’. This really IS the sort of writing I start with. Darn you, Admiral Halsey!

  • Shakey

    I dunno about the ‘reading backwards’ thing…I tried it and just got more confused.

    “!cibup lareneg eht fo tnorf ni bmud kool ot tnaw t’nod uoy ,lla retfA” ???

    Heck, that ALL looks like mistakes to me! (Well, except for “kool”)

    🙂

  • PreciseEdit

    One point that many writers don’t understand is that writing and proofreading require different skills, a different frame of mind. Writing is creative with some technical skills, and proofreading is technical with some creativity.

    Perhaps another point is that the work is very tedious and intensive. As such, one quick proofread of any document is probably not enough. We were finding too many missed errors during our quality control processes and finally had to institute a 3-part proofreading process: On screen, on paper, on screen. Once that processes is completed, we still have to perform quality control, and we still find the occasional error. With a goal of fewer than one mistake per 50 pages, one quick proofreading pass through a document simply won’t suffice.

Leave a comment: