Twitter
Email
RSSWhat’s Wrong with “Ain’t”
Back when I taught junior high school English I used to tell my students that they were allowed to use the word “ain’t” in their speaking and writing.
When they recovered their composure I went on to explain that they could use it in only one context.
They could not say or write
I ain’t
because there was a standard expression they could use:
I’m not.
They could not say or write
He ain’t, she ain’t, or they ain’t
because there were standard forms for those:
He isn’t, she isn’t, they aren’t.
They could, however, say or write
Ain’t I?
I pointed out that the usual “standard” form of “aren’t I” was not exactly grammatical. Would anyone ever say “are I not?”
My eccentric rule had the effect of making my students think about the verbs is and are.
And it made us all realize how seldom anyone has occasion to say ain’t I? anyway.
Got Your Free eBook?
- Subscribe to Daily Writing Tips and you will be able to download our free ebook: Basic English Grammar.
- You will also get all our grammar, spelling, punctuation and writing tips.
- The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).
I would never say “are I not?” because I would never say “I are…”. However, I would (and often do) say “am I not?”.
You don’t hear “aren’t I” being used in speech very much either. I do hear “amn’t I” but that’s more likely just a colloquial thing where I live.
“Are I not” is usually used as “Am I not” in my studies.
Well if it’s a tag question like; I’m late. aren’t I? it’s right so stop saying am I not? you’d better say ain’t I?
I agree with you allowed use of “ain’t”. I feel that language should always strive to provide a single correct word for a single meaning.
Pretentious people annoy the heck out of me. They think they are being “educated’ by saying “aren’t I”–not realizing that they just failed a question on an IQ test.
Another pet peeve of mine are the pretentious people who say
“Oh–I feel badly about his mother dying.” Would these rocket engineer’s say “I feel goodly about his mother’s recovery.”?
Another pet peeve is people who say ” Let’s try and acheive a perfect score on the test.”—when they should say “Let’s try TO acheive a perfect score on the test.”
Recently I was reading a book by Baldacci—and he seems to have dropped the word ‘into” from the English language. He says stuff like ” He put his hand in his pocket to grab his gun.” What’s wrong with “He put his hand into his pocked to grab his gun.”?
Also, in a vein different from writing, that is “pronunciation”— why do the pretentious pronounce “piano player” as Peenist?—when the only pronunciation is PYA-nist. A PYA-nist plays the pya-no ( 2 syllables)—and the peenist plays the —well ,—.
Enough,
Thanks for your very interesting work.
Phil
‘Ain’t I’ should never be used. It’s awful and will make you sound like Dick van Dyke in Mary Poppins.
It should always be ‘aren’t I’. Ain’t is ok if you’re being ironic/knowing/smug. As in ‘watch Katie and Peter on TV last night? High brow it ain’t.’
My linguist cousin-in-law says the word “ain’t” evolved with Scottish immigrants who tried to stick with the structure of their language when translating and tried to say “am’nt.” It is rather awkward to have the m and n together like that, so ain’t evolved.
I’m not encouraging anyone to say “ain’t” in any context. I just feel that it makes more sense as a contraction of “am I not?” than “aren’t I?” does.
For you ESL speakers, “ain’t” is one of those English shibboleths that one uses at the risk of being thought an ignoramus.
I just felt like sowing a little discord today.
My remark is a remark on the statement below:
I have been known to say and/or write “Am I not?” and to feel quite confident in knowing that my subject and verb match. I have rarely been know to say “ain’t I?” unless I’m feeling the absurdity of the situation.
“They could, however, say or write
Ain’t I?
I pointed out that the usual “standard” form of “aren’t I” was not exactly grammatical. Would anyone ever say “are I not?””
Great points all.
But, I have to be contrary I guess, ain’t would be a 100% usable word if constructing dialogue for any number of our fellow citizens, in thousands of areas across the country.
I grew up in Hicksville, USA. Being a redneck was a badge of honor many wore. You were a hundred times more likely to hear “ain’t” than “aren’t” in everyday conversation.
If my story revolves around locals, then to be authentic I would be forced to offend the grammar police and use good ole ain’t.
To do otherwise would come off as non-realistic, especially to my readers who live daily surrounded by the characters I remember.
“Oh–I feel badly about his mother dying.” Would these rocket engineer’s say “I feel goodly about his mother’s recovery.”?
Hilariously, one of my pet peeves is the use of apostrophes in plurals. But, if I write a rant about it, no doubt there will be some other grammatical error present…
Ain’t is not yet accepted as Standard English, but it is perfectly acceptable in social conversations and in written dialogues—inside quotation marks. I have a feeling it will soon be added to the dictionary. I’m writing my second novel, and I still cringe every time I used the word wanna. Describing an orgasm comes much easier to me than writing that word.
Jeanie’s reply (#7) has always been my understanding as well. “I ain’t, he isn’t, they aren’t.” It was frowned upon because of wide misuse (he ain’t, they ain’t) and eventually deemed categorically improper, though it has always been a grammatically correct contraction for “am not”. Or am I wrong? I consider it a judg(e)ment call.
If you know you’re using it correctly, good for you. If you understand there are people ignorant of its correct usage who will consider you uneducated for using it, even better. If the purpose of your communication is to communicate your ideas, you still succeed.
Umm…Philip; the instrument “piano” (as opposed to the direction on sheet music) has three syllables (”pee-AN-oh”, not “pya-no”), and the person who plays one is properly called a “PEE-an-ist” (again, three syllables — not a “pee-nist”). The word “piano” (pya-no) does exist, though not in reference to the instrument, but there’s no such word as “PYA-nist”.
I say “ain’t” in conversation. I know it’s not correct, but sometimes it’s good just to break the rules.
I’m awaiting so many arguments against that sentence.
I also say “y’all”. Y’all makes more grammatical sense, given that it means “you all”.
Maybe I’m a hick– I’m not denying it!– but I see nothing wrong with the sentence, “What are y’all talking about?”
I ain’t never going to use ain’t again.
But on the serious note.. amazing way of showing how and when to use it or not to
Alice2: I occasionally use “y’all”, when it’s important to distinguish between singular and plural “you” (the Right Thing, I suppose, would be to use “thou” for the singular, but that makes me want to use archaic verb forms as well, and makes people laugh at me…
), but I ain’t never used “ain’t”.
I ain’t gonna stop using the word “ain’t” just for some people who ironically think they’re being good grammatical pedants by insisting on its illegitimacy.
What I do not understand is why you don’t allow “I ain’t” in place of “I’m not”. Should they not say, “I am not”, also? =P
Then again, your reasoning for disallowing the other uses of “ain’t” seem not to be concerned with the fact that “ain’t” is “am not”, which is inappropriate entirely for those instances, which I think is more important than the existence of alternative phrasings.
(If we’re only to phrase any given thought in particular manners dictated by convention rather than rule, poets should be quickly out of function).
I’m loving the above post by Philip Dragonetti.
Good stuff!