Poring over “Pore” and “Pour”

Some confusion appears to exist regarding the use of pour and pore.

Charlie complains that he has to pour through stacks of badly-written letters to the editor every day.

In this context the word should be pore. The usual idiom is “to pore over.” Apparently the preposition “through” has entered into use, as in the above quotation, and as in this headline in the New York Times:

Teachers Pore Through Stacks Of Possibilities

The verb pore, with the meaning “examine closely,” may derive from two Old English words, a verb, spyrian, meaning “to investigate, examine,” and a noun, spor, meaning “a trace, vestige.”

The noun pore, meaning “an opening in the skin,” is not related to the verb in the expression “to pore over.” The noun comes from a Greek word meaning “a passageway.”

The verb pour, meaning to transfer water or some other substance from a container, came into English by way of Old French from a Latin verb, purare, “to purify.” In ritual practice, objects are purified by pouring water over them. The English word pure comes from Latin purus, “pure.” The Latin verb came from the Latin noun.

Memory device:

Lore is learning, knowledge, doctrine. To become well-versed in computer lore or the lore of magic, or the lore of religion, one must pore over learned tomes.

Subscribe By Email And Get A Free eBook!

  • Subscribe to Daily Writing Tips and you will be able to download our free ebook: "Basic English Grammar."
  • You will also get all our grammar, spelling, punctuation and writing tips.
  • The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).

16 Responses to “Poring over “Pore” and “Pour””

  1. Deborah on April 14, 2008 2:55 pm

    But Maeve, you left out “poor.” :)

    In Texas pore, pour, and poor are all pronounced “poar.” If you have trouble saying poar, remember to move your jaw sideways.

  2. Pat on April 14, 2008 3:06 pm

    So I could pour syrup over my waffles and then pore over them to make sure they were covered in syrup.

  3. Maeve on April 14, 2008 4:46 pm

    Deborah,
    So I did.

    I pronounce poor, tour and moor all the same, and they don’t rhyme with “or,” but on the radio I often hear announcers and others from the East coast pronounce poor and tour as if they did rhyme with or. I thought the “pore” pronunciation for “poor” was a southern thing.

  4. Rick Minor on April 14, 2008 7:47 pm

    But…… aren’t over and through both prepositions that are interchangeable ? I’m just a little confused on this.

    Thanks;

    Rick Minor

  5. Vismay on April 15, 2008 8:05 am

    Actually, ‘over” and “through” cannot always be used interchangeably.
    “Over” means to go from above it. “Through” means to penetrate.
    But yes in most scenarios they can be used in place of each other.

  6. Vismay on April 15, 2008 8:05 am

    Actually, ‘over” and “through” cannot always be used interchangeably.
    “Over” means to go from above it. “Through” means to penetrate.
    But yes in most scenarios they can be used in place of each other.

  7. Rick Minor on April 15, 2008 2:48 pm

    Thank you Vismay. I’ve had a head cold for over a week and the “lights” are still not on yet.

  8. Zrah on April 16, 2008 4:02 pm

    I suspect “pore through” has come about as a confused version of “paw through”…

  9. carol cherry on April 16, 2008 6:39 pm

    I could pore over my poor pores and then pour pure water over them?

  10. lily on July 2, 2009 7:46 pm

    sometimes the english language is just ridiculous.

  11. Maeve on July 6, 2009 2:32 pm

    Lily,
    Isn’t life?

  12. Barbara Youree on August 13, 2009 12:11 am

    Wow! That’s pretty impressive—being cited in the WSJ!!!! Congrats! And that’s a pretty impressive e-book to boot!

  13. Maeve on August 13, 2009 1:09 am

    Barbara,
    Thanks for the enthusiasm.

    For those readers who don’t know what you mean about the WSJ:
    an article in the Wall Street Journal contains a link to this post about “pore” and “pour.”

    http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/200.....ng-frenzy/

  14. Lauren on November 26, 2009 7:26 pm

    I knew it wasn’t “pour”, but was wondering if it was “paw”. Was leaning towards “pore” though, so thanks for clearing that up.

  15. heather on December 29, 2009 12:54 am

    You settled an argument (friendly) that we had at our family Christmas gathering. Thanks… even though this means I lost. But, who has really lost who has gained knowledge?

Got something to say?





Want Your Own Money Making Website?

Popular Articles

Self Publish Your Book! Grammar and Spelling Check Services