Averse, Adverse
It is easy to confuse adverse and averse but their meanings are totally different.
Adverse means unfavorable, contrary or hostile, and can never be applied to humans. You often hear it used in the term ‘adverse weather conditions’, a phrase which is best avoided in favor of ‘bad weather’.
Averse means unwilling or disinclined or loath and is always followed by the preposition ‘to’. It applies to a person and is used like this: ‘He was averse to discussing the conference’. Of course, it would be just as easy to say. ‘He didn’t want to discuss the conference’.
Overuse of both averse and adverse is likely to sound pompous. It’s always better to keep it simple.
Related Articles
No related posts.
Share
Join Over 50,000 Email Subscribers and Get a Free eBook!
- Subscribe to DailyWritingTips.com via email and you'll be able to download our ebook, "Basic English Grammar."
- You will also get all our writing tips delivered to your email inbox, completely free!
- The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).


Averse can also follow a behavior to categorize people. For example, someone who invests in only very secure investments would be considered a risk averse.
In other words, disclined to take risks – nice example, Joe
Good day gentlemen,
this lesson provide a clear distinction in the Queen’s language, and I really appreciate were you to continued your good work.
Good luck
I detected some adverse grammatical conditions present in T. Daoda Carlon’s response, however I am averse to pointing it out. (So this is painful for me on a couple of levels.)
Mentally substituting the noun form of averse usually clears up problems, as most people are more familiar with its usage.
So instead of thinking “He is averse to education”, you would think “He has an aversion to education”.
Ms. Daoda Carlon,
I’m truly sorry to break it to you but it is *always* the ‘Kings English’; never the “Queens Language” regardless the monarch’s gender.
Bob
Bob,
I think that it is regardless of the monarch’s sex, not gender.
Your definition insists adverse can never apply to humans yet there is a legal definition for an “adverse witness”, a witness who offers adverse testimony to the calling party during direct examination. I do not know that a witness can be anything but human. Perhaps this is a misnomer – the term “hostile witness” is also used interchangeably with “adverse witness”.