Oxford Comma: Yes or No? A Compilation of Opinions and Recommendations

By Daniel Scocco - 4 minute read

First things first: what is the Oxford comma? Also called serial comma, it is a comma placed after the penultimate item in a list and before the conjunction “and” or “or.”

Here’s a sample sentence without the Oxford comma:

We traveled to China, Thailand and Japan.

And here is the same sentence with the Oxford comma:

We traveled to China, Thailand, and Japan.

The Oxford comma is the one after “Thailand.”

There is a hot debate around its use because this is technically an optional punctuation mark, and in some sentences it clearly helps understanding and removes ambiguity while in others it can be redundant. (Wikipedia has a list of arguments for and against the Oxford comma.)

i want your oxford comma

Making things worse, this punctuation device can sometimes have serious business implications. In 2017 a company settled for $5 million with its drivers because the absence of the Oxford comma in the law text created ambiguity about overtime compensation.

Author Lynne Truss once wrote: “There are people who embrace the Oxford comma, and people who don’t, and I’ll just say this: never get between these people when drink has been taken.”

Below you will find a compilation of opinions and recommendations from publications and style guides, so that you can decide for yourself whether or not to use it.

In favor of the Oxford comma

Maeve Maddox (English Ph.D. and DWT writer) (link)

After a lifetime of being wishy-washy about the serial comma, I’ve reached a decision: I’m going to use it all the time. Such a momentous decision is, of course, a deeply personal matter. The pros and cons are widely, frequently, and hotly debated.

My choice is to travel the path of otiosity for the sake of uniformity.

Mark Nichol (UC Berkeley instructor and DWT writer) (link)

I strongly favor the serial comma. Why?

In a sentence such as “I bought one apple, two bananas and three oranges,” no ambiguity exists. But in “I ordered ham and eggs, toast and jam and pie and ice cream,” the cavalcade of conjunctions gets confusing, and in contexts in which it’s not as clear which list items might be distinct and which might be linked, the absence of the final comma might require readers to reread the sentence to establish the organization. So, the solution in this case is to use a serial comma when confusion could arise.

Mary Cullen (Business writing instructor)

I recommend using the serial comma in business writing, since it is the customary convention. And, to me, it is much easier to consistently follow this convention, than to omit it most of the time and add it in when clarity is needed. Keep it simple.

The Chicago Manual of Style

When a conjunction joins the last two elements in a series, a comma—known as the serial or series comma or the Oxford comma—should appear before the conjunction.

The Elements of Style

In a series of three or more terms with a single conjunction, use a comma after each term except the last.

MLA Style Guide (link)

Fair-weather comma users: publications that do not require the serial comma may use it only when misreading results. Proponents of the serial comma, like the MLA, would decry the inconsistency of the use-it-when-you-need-it approach and advocate using the serial comma in all series of three or more items or phrases.

Grammarly

Unless you’re writing for a particular publication or drafting an essay for school, whether or not you use the Oxford comma is generally up to you. However, omitting it can sometimes cause some strange misunderstandings.

Against the Oxford comma (with exceptions allowed)

Associated Press Stylebook

Use commas to separate elements in a series, but do not put a comma before the conjunction in a simple series. Put a comma before the concluding conjunction in a series, however, if an integral element of the series requires a conjunction:

I had orange juice, toast, and ham and eggs for breakfast.

The New York Times style guide (link)

Style guides for book and academic publishing generally would insist on another comma after “pears,” the so-called serial comma or Oxford comma. But news writing has traditionally omitted the serial comma — perhaps seeking a more rapid feeling in the prose, or perhaps to save time and effort in the old days of manual typesetting.

We do use the additional comma in cases where a sentence would be awkward or confusing without it: Choices for breakfast included oatmeal, muffins, and bacon and eggs.

University of Oxford stylebook (link)

Note that there is no comma between the penultimate item in a list and ‘and’/‘or’, unless required to prevent ambiguity – this is sometimes referred to as the ‘Oxford comma’. However, always insert a comma in this position if it would help prevent confusion

Canadian Press Stylebook

Put commas between elements of a series but not before the final and, or or nor unless that avoids confusion.

Penguin guide to punctuation

Note also that it is not usual in British usage to put a listing comma before the word and or or itself (though American usage regularly puts one there.) So, in British usage, it is not usual to write The Three Musketeers were Athos, Porthos, and Aramis.

Conclusion

This discussion has basically two camps: those who favor the universal use of the Oxford comma for the sake of simplicity and uniformity; and those who are against it, except when it is necessary to remove ambiguity.

DailyWritingTips.com favors the universal use of the Oxford comma.

Want to improve your English in 5 minutes a day? Click here to subscribe and start receiving our writing tips and exercises via email every day.

Recommended Articles for You


9 Responses to “Oxford Comma: Yes or No? A Compilation of Opinions and Recommendations”

  • James Madara

    There are two types of people: ones who use the Oxford comma and the others want to see the world burn.

  • Marci Lindsay

    Did I miss your example where HAVING the Oxford comma CAUSED confusion?

  • Dan Swango , PhD

    Of course the Oxford comma should be used. Why not? You’re never wrong to use it, and meaning is never unclear or misleading; but not using it can make meaning unclear or misleading just often enough, even if infrequently, to use it. Again, why not use it? There are no advantages to omitting the Oxford comma.

    The comma separates; the lack of a comma runs the last two items together making a possible unintended joining, connection, or marriage of the last two items.

  • Dale A. Wood

    “Did I miss your example where HAVING the Oxford comma CAUSED confusion?” I AGREE, I AGREE, I AGREE !!

  • TheBluebird11

    When I first learned, many moons ago, that the Oxford comma could be eliminated, I was happy. I have enough visual clutter in my life. After having read this post, however, it seems to me that it’s not the best idea to leave it up to each person to decide for her/himself what might cause ambiguity for someone else. It then becomes like a Rorschach picture and each person only sees what s/he sees. We have enough flipflop rules- with-exceptions in English, so if we can find a rule that is really a RULE, NO EXCEPTIONS, let’s do it. I give in. I will always use the Oxford comma. Besides, it sounds so cute.

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Marci and @Dale,

    Agreed. I edited that paragraph.

  • venqax

    Very interesting and informative, thank you. I agree with Dan Swango.

  • Sofia

    My 9th grade English teacher taught this to us using the example sentences of (to be fair I can’t remember the exact names she used but it was something like this):
    “At the party, there were two strippers, George Bush and Bill Clinton”
    vs.
    “At the party, there were two strippers, George Bush, and Bill Clinton”
    The first one makes it seem as if the two people mentioned after “two strippers” are the strippers. I like it.

  • D.A.W.

    @James Mandara. Very nice, very correct.
    Actually, when I read your sentence at first, its last word had disappeared, and I got this: “There are two types of people: ones who use the Oxford comma and the others want to see the world.”
    This is also true! I took “to see the world” as being a lowly sailor or a bicyclist crossing the continents like a nobody.
    Only today did I get the whole sentence: “There are two types of people: ones who use the Oxford comma and the others want to see the world burn.”
    Yes, those others want to see the world go to Hell.

Leave a comment: