50 Problem Words and Phrases
Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to conceive written communication. So many pairs or trios of words and phrases stymie us with their resemblance to each other. Here’s a quick guide to alleviate (or is it ameliorate?) your suffering:
1. a while / awhile: “A while” is a noun phrase; awhile is an adverb.
2. all together / altogether: All together now — “We will refrain from using that two-word phrase to end sentences like this one altogether.”
3. amend / emend: To amend is to change; to emend is to correct.
4. amount / number: Amount refers to a mass (“The amount saved is considerable”); number refers to a quantity (“The number of dollars saved is considerable”).
5. between / among: The distinction is not whether you refer to two people or things or to three or more; it’s whether you refer to one thing and another or to a collective or undefined number — “Walk among the trees,” but “Walk between two trees.”
6. biannual / biennial: Biannual means twice a year; biennial means once every two years.
7. bring / take: If it’s coming toward you, it’s being brought. If it’s headed away from you, it’s being taken.
8. compare to / compare with: “Comparing to” implies similarity alone; “compare with” implies contrast as well.
9. compliment / complement: To compliment is to praise; to complement is to complete.
10. comprise, consist of / compose, constitute: Comprise means “include,” so test by replacement — “is included of” is nonsense, and so is “is comprised of.” The whole comprises the parts or consists of the parts, but the parts compose or constitute the whole.
11. connote / denote: To connote is to convey (“Air quotes connote skepticism or irony”); to denote is to specify (“A stop sign denotes the requirement to halt”).
12. continual / continuous: Continual events are frequently repeated, or intermittent. Continuous events are uninterrupted, or constant.
13. credible / credulous: To be credible is to be authoritative; to be credulous is to be gullible.
14. deserts / desserts: If you eat only cake, pie, ice cream, and the like, you eat just desserts. If you have it coming to you, you get your just deserts as well. (However, the connotation is negative, so hit the gym.)
15. different from / different than: The former phrase is preferred in formal writing; but “differently than” is always correct usage.
16. discreet / discrete: Discreet means “subtle”; discrete means “separate.” (“He discreetly reminded them of their discrete meanings.”)
17. each other / one another: “One another” is preferred in formal writing when more than two of something are being discussed.
18. economic / economical: Economic refers to the science of economics; economical suggests frugality.
19. elemental/elementary: What’s elemental is essential or integral to nature; what’s elementary is basic.
20. ensure / insure / assure: To ensure is to guarantee, to insure is to indemnify, and to assure is to comfort or convince.
21. epidemic / endemic / pandemic: An epidemic is the outbreak of disease in a limited place and time; an endemic disease is a recurring one peculiar to a place or population; a pandemic is pervasive over a wide geographical area.
22. forgo / forego: To forgo is to go without; to forego is to go before (and is generally used only in the forms foregoing and foregone, which are themselves rare).
23. gibe / jibe / jive: To gibe (soft g, as in gym) is to taunt or insult (though jibe is an alternate spelling), to jibe with is to coincide or fit, to jive is to deceive.
24. historic / historical: Something historic is remarkable for its impact on history; something historical is simply an event in history.
25. home in / hone in: To home in is to close in; to hone in is to confuse one word for another. (“Hone in” has no meaning.)
26. jealousy / envy: Jealousy is resentment; envy is covetousness.
27. lay / lie: Lay is transitive, associated with a direct object — “Lay that pencil down.” “Yesterday, I laid that pencil down.” “That pencil has been laid down.” Lie is intransitive, not so associated — “Lie down.” “Last night, I lay down.” “It was my plan to have lain down already.
28. leach / leech: To leach is to dissolve by percolation; to leech is to remove blood with a leech or to exhaust; as a noun, it means a parasitic worm or the human figurative equivalent, or the edge of a sail (also spelled leach).
29. libel / slander: Libel is written defamation; slander is the spoken equivalent.
30. may / might: May refers to factual or possible; might is appropriate for the hypothetical or counterfactual.
31. nauseous / nauseated: To be nauseous is to cause sickness. To be nauseated is to feel sick.
32. notable / noticeable / noteworthy: Something notable is worthy of note. Something noticeable is capable of being noticed. Noteworthy is a synonym of notable, though the former implies the unusual and the latter the commendable.
33. partly / partially: Partly means “in part”; partially means “incomplete” or, rarely, is an antonym for unfairly.
34. peak / pique: To peak is to reach the pinnacle; to pique is to arouse interest or to bother.
35. people / persons: People has assumed primacy; persons is reserved mostly as a synonym for bodies (“those belongings carried on their persons”).
36. persuade / convince: To persuade someone is to motivate them to do something; to convince someone is to lead them to understand or believe.
37. predominantly / predominately: Both forms are correct, but predominantly predominates.
38. purposely / purposefully: What’s done purposely is done on purpose; what’s done purposefully is done with a purpose.
39. regrettably / regretfully: Regrettably is a synonym for unfortunately; regretfully means just that — full of regret.
40. repetitive / repetitious: Both terms have acquired a negative connotation, but the former retains a more neutral meaning.
41. sensual / sensuous: Sensual has an erotic connotation; sensuous refers more neutrally to what is pleasurable to the senses.
42. since / because: Informally, these terms are interchangeable, but in formal writing, since should be used only to refer to time.
43. stationary / stationery: To be stationary is to stand still; stationery refers to letter-writing materials.
44. that / which: That is used restrictively (“The pencil that is sharp” — among more than one pencil, the one with that characteristic); which is employed nonrestrictively (“The pencil, which is sharp” — one pencil alone, possessing that characteristic). The distinction is rarely observed other than in American English.
45. tortuous / torturous: A tortuous experience is a winding one; a torturous one is painful.
46. transcript / transcription: A transcript is a thing; a transcription is the process of creating it.
47. verbal / oral: Verbal refers to both written and spoken communication, but oral is useful for distinguishing the latter from the former.
48. while / although / whereas: Informally, while is a synonym for the other two terms, but in formal writing it should be reserved for temporal connotations.
49. wreak / wreck: These terms do not share etymological origin; you wreck a party, but you do so by wreaking havoc.
50. whether / if: Both words are correct in expressing a choice, but the former is more appropriate in formal writing (“I can’t decide whether to go”), whereas the latter is better reserved for reference to possibility or probability (“I’ll go if you do”).
Subscribe to Receive our Articles and Exercises via Email
- You will improve your English in only 5 minutes per day, guaranteed!
- Subscribers get access to our exercise archives, writing courses, writing jobs and much more!
- You'll also get three bonus ebooks completely free!
102 Responses to “50 Problem Words and Phrases”
Excellently useful listing, Mark.
“15. different from / different than: The former phrase is preferred in formal writing; but “differently than” is always correct usage.” Yes, but in US usage. In British English and its relatives “differently” cannot be followed by “than”. We use “to” and “from”, with “from” as the preferred use. Maeve has a 2007 posting on this. She notes that Fowler in his English Usage does not mention “different than”. Presumably because it didn’t register on his radar. It is still generally regarded here as unacceptable.
“44. […] The distinction is rarely observed other than in American English.” More’s the pity! I’m with you on this one, though I wonder if the battle isn’t on the way to being lost.
My English teacher never told me this.
Fisayo @ Secrets of Entrepreneurship
Great article. I’ve saved it. Thanks for sharing
Thanks for this great list!
1. a while / awhile: “A while” is a noun phrase; awhile is an adverb. This one usually ‘wreaks’ havoc on one’s writing.
Excellent list! #23 to jibe – has nautical origins (tack and jibe) where to jibe is to go with the wind. So, when two things jibe or jibe with each other, it means they go together.
One that I often have to fix is “alright” vs. “all right.” “Alright” is substandard. The correct term is “all right.”
#42 (“since” vs. “because”) is great. We use “because” to establish causality and “since” for a passage of time. If we use “since” for causality (which is possible), the reader may have to stop and figure out what you mean. This is more work than we want the reader to do, and it detracts from engagement in the ideas being expressed.
Another one we often correct is “less” vs. “fewer.” Here’s what “Which Word Do I Use?” has to say about these 2 problem words.
“Less” vs. “Fewer”
This one is pretty simple, and most people would recognize any error if they stopped long enough to think about it. The problem is that we are more accustomed to saying “less” than we are to saying “fewer,” so we tend to use “less” for everything, even when it’s the wrong word. I’ll show you the difference so that you can use these words consciously and correctly.
“Less” refers to quantities that we cannot count, to things that are a single whole, or to a concept.
For example, freedom is a concept, so it is a single thing. You can’t have 2 freedoms. (You can have multiple privileges or rights that we call freedoms, but that is something different. Here, we’re referring to the general concept of freedom, which is singular.)
Fat is a single thing, a term we use to refer to all the extra weight our bodies carry around. You can have two fat cells, but you only have one fat.
Finally, sand is a single thing, a single quantity comprised of grains of sand.
Here’s how these examples are used in sentences.
“People of the Middle Ages had less freedom than people have today.”
“After finishing my diet, I had less fat around my hips.”
“The beach had less sand after the storm.”
“Fewer” refers to quantities that we can count, things that we can have in quantities.
For example, you can have multiple light bulbs in your home, and you can count them. Although coffee as a type of drink is singular (requiring “less”), we can also refer to individual servings or portions as coffees; the portions can be counted. Finally, a birthday is an event, and you can count the number of birthdays.
Here’s how these examples are used in sentences.
“If we remember to turn off the lights when we leave, we will need to buy fewer light bulbs.”
“I bought fewer coffees this week than last week.”
“My mother wishes that she had had fewer birthdays.”
One good trick to determine whether you have a countable or non-countable thing is to use the word in a sentence and replace it with a pronoun. If you replace the word with the singular pronoun “it,” then you have a non-countable thing and will use “less.” If you replace the word with the plural pronoun “they” or “them,” then you have a countable thing and will use “fewer.”
Let’s try this trick and see how it works.
“The pickles were sour.” Are “pickles” countable or not? We can replace “pickles” with the pronoun “they,” as follows: “They were sour.” From this we know that “pickles” is a multiple, countable thing, so we can use “fewer.”
“I seem to have fewer pickles than I expected.”
Here’s another way to think about this: If you can have a few of them, use “fewer.”
Remember: If you can count individual items, use “fewer.” If you can’t, then use “less.”
A little trick for teaching youngsters about lay and lie:
1. To LAY something down is to PLACE it. The long A sound is the key.
2. To LIE is to RECLINE. The long I sound ties the two ideas together.
Re: wreak. I had a newspaper editor who told me that if I ever wrote “wreak” in a story, he would wreck my knuckles. I like my knuckles so I never, ever used the word “wreak.”
Good list, but I feel you missed further and farther.
First of all, I’m a new visitor to this website and have been dropping in quite regularly since discovering it. It’s an excellent resource and I enjoy reading through the lively discussion too. So, many thanks to its authors!
I had a quick question/suggestion regarding no. 11 here – I wondered whether ‘connoting’ was more like ‘implying’ or ‘suggesting’, rather than simply ‘conveying’?
Try again, this is wrong:
“24. historic / historical: Something historic is remarkable for its impact on history; something historical is simply an event in history.”
This is correct:
Historic: an event, place, or ‘thing’ in history. Historical: something regarding or dealing with an event, place, or thing in history. Examples: Gettysburg is a historic battlefield; a Gettysburg Historical Society would be a society about the history of Gettysburg.
These tips are really informative.
Check out the book “Inside a Dog” if you’re interested in humorous, yet helpful grammar advice on commonly made mistakes:
Yes, connote means “imply” as as well as “convey.” I was trying to keep my annotation brief, but you’re right.
To follow on from Deborah H’s “little trick for teaching youngsters”. I have always been able to smooth furrowed brows (and not just those of youngsters!) by using “e for envelope” to explain the difference between stationary / stationery (#43 in the list above).
If you do another similar list, then bought / brought also seems to perplex otherwise intelligent beings. 🙂
I agree with all the other responses concerning the usefulness of this list. Good stuff.
Partially is a synonym for unfairly, not an antonym.
Craig: Regarding “farther” and “further”
Here’s what “Which Word Do I Use?” has to say about those words:
These two words are very similar in meaning, and that is why they cause so much confusion. They both refer to extending or going beyond a certain point. Many writers use only one word for all meanings, but this mistake reveals the writer’s misunderstanding of both the word meanings and the concepts behind these two words.
“Farther” refers specifically to a greater measurable distance. You can drive farther, see farther, throw a ball farther. Then you can go measure how much farther you drove, saw, etc. The error, obviously, is to use “further,” which does not indicate a measurable distance.
“Further” refers specifically to extending a concept, spending more time, or, basically, any type of extension or expansion that is not a measurable distance. This is the trickier word, so I’ll give you a few correct examples.
“Let’s talk about your problems further.”
“He made further progress on his dissertation.”
“The boy made further noise after being scolded by the librarian.”
Remember: “Farther” for [measurable] distance; “further” for everything else.
I was hoping to see “affect – effect”. Oh well, I guess I’ll never get it right.
Two other examples I’ve noticed people always seem to get mixed up on:
Practise / Practice and affect / effect
I always remember practise being the verb and practice the noun. But when someone asks me how to tell the difference between ‘affect’ and ‘effect’, I don’t know how to explain it. I know which one to use, but I don’t know why…
Don E. Chute
I am glad I stumbled upon you. I may even subscribe by mail for up to date information and the Ebook.
Conform to / conform with is also a killer … and it seems as though the jury is still out. I generally choose the “with” to match the Latin “con”. However, there are times when conform to is, apparently, the correct format. I now get around it by using “comply with”. It’s a one-size-fits all solution and so much easier. If an explanation on conform is forthcoming in future “DailyWritingTips” that would be just great.
Then there’s replace with / replace by …
BTW, Don: the daily e-mail is well worth it. So is the e-book.
I always remember practise being the verb and practice the noun.
And similarly for license/license, etc. (Doesn’t apply in American English, though; they only have practice/licence/etc.)
Repeat after me “There are colloquialisms” also repeat after me “English is not French, there is no language academy that codifies the language”.
I get mixed up with a while and awhile alot.
Stumbleupon finally sends me to something I can use. Great article. Duly printed and I am sure will be referred to regularly.
What a great idea for an article! English being my second language, I have found myself struggle with a few of the listed pairs in the past, and I’ll be sure to come back to this list in my uncertainty.
However, one duo that I’ve seen mis-used countless times even by native English-speakers seems to be missing:
“then” vs. “than”
True, these are both little words, almost too small to notice. But maybe that is precisely the reason so many people think one thing is “better then” another and they “went shopping and than for a coffee”.
Or maybe I am simply super sensitive to this mistake and therefore see it more often than it is generally made?
“farther” and “further” always do cause me trouble, and your explanation has helped clear it up to a degree. I am still confused though: “The hotel is a little further down the road” sounds natural enough, much more common than “[…] farther down the road”, but following your guide “farther” would be correct?
affect v. effect – A very simple rule of thumb is that affect is a verb (to influence) and effect is a noun (a result of some sort). To “effect” as a verb means to cause, and generally it only shows up in technical writing – e.g., to effect a change or to effect a result. So, the simple rule is the safest and easiest to remember.
What about ability/capabililty?
“Amount” and “Number” run afoul of the near ubiquitous supermarket gaff of “Fewer” and “Less”. It a matter of countability or not.
I thought these were pretty much common knowledge these days, until I started my article directory! After rejecting over a hundred articles during the past five days, I realize how many people need this information.
Hope you don’t mind if I link to it!
“Walk between the trees” i.e. without bumping into them with a sense of direction and “walk among the trees” i.e to give the mood of enjoying the walk and the trees. Both work for me; it’s a question of what you want to say.
Usage of “in” and “at”
e.g. He lived in Canberra or “He lived at Canberra”
Do I write too much and trouble with the language too little? A mentor and an editor are keys. What I need most is an agent. Are there any honest agents out there?
The two terms which I find annoying when transposed, (and which I have noticed in two of the last five books I have read) are ‘upwind’ and ‘downwind’. The characters were relieved that they were upwind of the creature chasing them. Ask any hunter: you want to be downwind so it/they can’t smell you and snack on you.
Over/more than: over is a preposition (jump over the fence)not over 50 miles….More than 50 miles, more than 100 dollars…not over 100 dollars.
Continual and continuous are synonymous and therefore interchangeable when the mean incessant.
“That” introduces a defining, exclusive clause, “which” is non-defining additional information. Well-educated people usually differentiate them.
“Partially” is a synonym, not an antonym of “unfairly”.
“Whether” isn’t all that formal, nor is it always interchangeable with “if”.
Does “I can’t decide if to go” sound right?
Love it. Thanks for this.
To effect change, you must have an effect on circumstances. But no silly affectations, please. They don’t affect me.
Here is a link to a previous column on this site that says “differently than” is NOT “always correct usage,” as you hold in #15.
oe: Yes, the hotel is a little FARTHER down the road. The distance to the hotel is measurable, not conceptual.
Here’s another example of “farther” and “further”: “If we travel farther, we will have the opportunity to speak further. Furthermore, this is a beautiful day to drive farther.”
“Farther” is akin to “longer.”
“Further” is akin to “additional.”
However, you raise an interesting point: what sounds right vs. what is right. Most people speak and write according to what they hear and read. We say “Well, that sounds/looks right to me.”
I think this is one reason why that pesky apostrophe-S for plurals is becoming so common: many people are accustomed to seeing it, so it looks right (or doesn’t catch their attention at all). Another common examples of this is the use of “me and him” as the subject of a sentence (or other variations), as in “Me and him are going to the movies on Saturday.”
7 bring/take : The distinction given is correct but trivial and, by and large, everybody get it right when “you” are not doing the taking or bringing. But what happens when you are reporting on your bringing or taking something somewhere? This is more subtle and requires that there be a reference location; implicit or explicit. E.G. In conversation about a party Jake would say “I brought the beer”. But the next morning, at home explaining some missing inventory, it would be “I took the beer to the party”.
The first of these is a verb; the second one is a noun.
Great article. Thank you. I’m here via Stumbleupon. I’ll definitely be back.
Possessive nouns/plural nouns:
Only use apostrophes to show possession, or missing letters in a contraction.
Possessive nouns: Always put the apostrophe after who/what the ‘something’ belongs to. For example: the (single) child’s toys, the (multiple) children’s toys, the (one) boy’s toys, the (two) boys’ toys
Contractions: can + not = can’t. The apostrophe stands for the missing n and o.
Plural nouns only need an apostrophe if they are possessive; if no possession is being indicated, don’t use an apostrophe. Examples: I have two dogs. You can eat three pieces of pizza.
deserts/desserts: A single s ususally refers to a desert, such as the Gobi Desert. A barren area of a land with little rainfall. Only in the pharse “just deserts” does it mean you get what you “deser”ved.
like i said ,who taught you how spoke.lol.
Mary K. Smalley
Love this site. Thanks.
Here is a URL for an earlier column on this site about different from/to/than (#15)
It seems not everyone thinks “differently than” is “always correct usage.”
Over implies relationship in space: The painting hangs over the mantle.
More than implies quantity: Last year he earned more than $100,000 with his websites.
The confusion that exists between “affect” and “effect” deserves a post of its own.
Wow, this was terrific, thank you! Even the comments are helpful! I’m particularly annoyed by the misuse of ensure and insure so I’m glad you included that one.
If you can’t remember the rules for affect/effect, remember RAVEN.
It’s not 100% accurate, but it’s sufficient for most of our daily writing/speaking.
I found this post valuable and informative. It addresses commonly used words which should be clarified for proper usage. Thank you for sharing.
On the subject of affect and effect. Affect is a verb and a noun, depending on how it is used. It is a verb if it is used to influence or act on. It is a noun when used as a feeling or emotion. Effect is also a noun and a verb depending on how it is used. It is a noun if used as result or to make changes and a verb if used to produce as an effect, bring about, accomplish or make happen. I do hope this helps to clarify affect and effect.
I’m so glad this was posted; it’s very useful! Thank you, found this via StumbleUpon.
However, I would like to ask about the difference between “save” and “except”. Example of what I mean:
“There was no difference SAVE the color of their skins.”
“There was no difference EXCEPT for the color of their skins.”
I know that “save” is rather uncommon in this usage. However, is it a correct usage, and is one over the other preferred in formal writing?
My number one pet peeve is when people misuse the past tense of “hang”. For the most part the past tense is “hung” unless you’re talking about the death of someone by hanging in which case it is “hanged.”
The Dark Engine
Repeat after me: “Run-on sentences are always incorrect.” And no, they are not considered colloquialisms.
I’ve resisted “different than” because it conveys — awkwardly — the comparative sense. I’ve stayed with “different from” because it — appropriately — refers rather than compares. Is it ever possible that English grammar rules made a slip on this one?
I have a doubt about “is comprised of” being nonsense.
The Cambridge dictionary provides an example of its usage: The class is comprised mainly of Italian and French students. (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/comprise).
The use of save as a conjunction (“I know nothing about the book save the title”) or a preposition (“There is no God save one”) is, as you say, uncommon, and I think becoming archaic and obsolete. I would use it only for period effect.
Is there anyone else out there who is bothered by “charged with” as in “the team is charged with the project”?
How did this piece of inelegant passive pablum get in to our beautiful language?
I think this is a job for the Subject Verb Object Superhero!
Title and entitle? “The author should be entitled to title the work.” Or, should the author entitle the work? Seems “entitle” is often abused by those in highly educated circles.
Helpful. I skimmed through specifically to find effect/affect, though, and I even read through previous comments to find it, and am still confused by it. Which one is a verb and which is a noun, and can you give examples on when/how to use them?
Title and entitle. Does a writer “entitle” a work? Does one title a vehicle or entitle a vehicle? Seems entitle is often misused when the correct word should be title or titled.
Couldn’t ask for anything more. With all those different topics, it makes the site so enriching.
Both affect and effect are nouns as well as verbs. Psychologists speak of an unemotional person as having a flat affect, and something can have or lack an effect. The distinction between the verb forms — they are, in effect, antonyms — is demonstrated below:
Affect can mean either “to influence,” or “to pretend” or “take on”: “The change in weather affected her outlook” or “The change in weather caused her to affect a happiness she did not feel.”
Effect means “to cause”: “The change in weather effected a corresponding alteration in her outlook.”
Entitle is correct but has a grandiose connotation — but, in the first usage you describe, title is itself often unnecessary: In the phrase “The book, titled The Chicago Manual of Style,” titled can be omitted without any loss of comprehension.
I’ve never heard or read a reference to a car being entitled — except to regular maintenance.
Mark did a good job at describing affect and effect, but below I have broken the meanings of the words down into the nouns and verbs for all the readers that may still be confused about them.
affect: v., to influence / to act on
n., feeling or emotion
effect: n., result / to make changes
v., to produce as an effect / bring about / accomplish / make
There are 2,684+ such same sounding words in our English language. They are called homonyms and homophones. I have written and published a book on these same sounding words.
In my dictionary antonym is a noun and means a word of opposite meanings. A homonym is a noun, and means one or two or more words spelled and pronounced alike but different in meaning. A homophone is a noun and means one of two or more words pronounced alike but different in meaning or derivation or spelling. I personally classify them as being homophones…
I do hope Mark and I helped clarify affect and effect. If you have other words you question, just let me know and I’ll do my best to help.
drupal web developer
Its very good informative blog,because in our daily life,we use more words and phrases.A word and phrases will have different meanings.So pronunciation is more important when we communicate each other.Thanks for sharing this information.
“Effect” vs. “Affect” seems to cause a lot of confusion. Here’s one take on the difference between these two words.
“Effect” is a noun that approximately means “result.” You can write “the effect,” “one effect,” and “an effect” because “effect” is a noun.
These two sentences use “effect” correctly as a noun:
“We don’t know what effect healthy food snacks will have on children’s food choices.”
“Caffeine has a soothing effect on children with ADHD.”
“Effect” is sometimes used as a verb to mean “cause,” as in “cause to occur.” For example, you can say, “The new laws will effect a change in how we treat patients with chronic conditions.”
“Affect” is a verb that approximately means “alter.” You can write “affects,” “affecting,” and “affected” because it is a verb.
“Affect” is a transitive verb, meaning it is done to something. Here, “affect” is used correctly as a transitive verb:
“The new legislation will affect the way we buy cars.”
“Cold weather conditions have affected zoo attendance.”
“Affect” can only be used as a noun when you are writing about an emotional response. A person’s affect is his or her emotional state. In all other cases, it is a verb. (When speaking: As a verb, the stress is on the second syllable. As a noun, the stress is on the first syllable.)
If you’re not sure which one you need, and you can’t decide whether you need a noun or a verb, try replacing the word with its definition and see which one fits what you’re trying to say.
“result” – use “effect” (n)
“cause” – use “effect” (v)
“alter” – use “affect” (v)
“emotional state” – use “affect” (n)
I hope this helps.
Some 95% of the time, affect with an a is going to be used as a verb**, and effect with an e is going to be used as a noun.**
This might help, but remember – correctly using “effect” and/or “affect” takes thought and care. There exists no method to differentiate when to correctly use these words.
As a Noun, affect means: “A FEELING”. As a Noun, “effect” means: “THE RESULT OR CONSEQUENCE of some action or process”.
As a Verb, affect means: “TO EXERT AN INFLUENCE UPON”. As a Verb, effect means: “TO BRING ABOUT AS A RESULT”.
Effect, as a verb, means to carry out or to ACCOMPLISH an action upon a noun – a person, place, or thing. Effect, as a noun, is the actual result of a verb – an action. Effect is used often as both noun and verb.
Affect, as a verb, means to influence or to produce something EMOTIONALLY upon a noun – a person, place, or thing. Affect, as noun, is the actual emotion or feeling. Affect is most often used as a verb. If you find yourself using “affect” as a noun, be sure to double/triple check your usage.
Rather short, but something that irks me…
If you are going to use the word ‘copyright,’ please SPELL IT RIGHT!
I do not want to see copywrite. You write what you have the RIGHTS to.
Still not sure? “Copyrite” is not going to give you a half a point.
Just a circle and a c with a date will not do.
Open a book, magazine, journal, etc. It is not difficult people!
Great article, I have sent this article on to other people that I know, thank you. Dessie Durham
Because you are sane, you ignored THE #1 error – its/it’s. I’ve seen it incorrectly written in newspapers and magazines.
As you can see from the comments, I “forgot” more than one of the usual suspects. I just couldn’t bring myself to discuss them, but perhaps I’ll follow up with a post about just the most obvious ones.
I was shocked that inflammable, flammable and nonflammable didn’t make the list. While all of the others aid in clear communication, only a few put life in jeopardy as much as this triplet. When people ask, I always remind them of what “inflame” or “inflammatory” implies, and take the cue from there. You certainly wouldn’t call someone benign who is inflamed, and saying something inflammatory can set off a firestorm.
Unfortunately, there’s only so much room on the Internet (and only so much time in my life) — I couldn’t fit every problem word and phrase in this post. But thanks for appending the flammable family here.
Life on Mars
You’ve got a brain, Niko, you can work it out – why feel the need to rely on someone else to give you information. You are responsible for your own learning.
Thank you! Having taught at university for a few years, I wish my students had known about these things. I wish *I* had known a few more so I could use them confidently rather than avoiding them altogether. Bookmarked!
I can’t believe affect and effect aren’t on here — people mix these up all the time!
How about ‘presume’ and ‘assume’? I’m still confused by those two and no one else seems to know!
Good question. Assume means to merely suppose; while presume has a stronger connotation of self-assured expectation.
I always have trouble with “over all” and “overall,” when to use which? In fact that was the first thing I checked for on this list. Do you have an explanation of this problem word/phrase?
This was an excellent article. I know you only have limited space, but another grammatical error I hear way too often these days is the misuse of “I” and “me.”
“My daughter and I went to the beach with John.” As opposed to “John went to the beach with my daughter and I” (which should be “me.” The rule is that either “I” or “me” should be able to stand alone if you eliminate the other person in the sentence.
insure/ensure is worth including here. Best to leave insure to mean the act of purchasing insurance, while ensure more generally means to “make sure” something happens. Insure tends to get used very often when ensure is properly meant.
Also healthy/healthful. While healthy has been used to mean both “being in good health, and “conducive to good health” for a long time (so can’t really call the latter use incorrect), it is worth trying to distinguish the 2 since having 2 words to mean 2 things is preferable to 1 word doing double duty. Socrates, after all, could’ve eaten a big helping of perfectly healthy hemlock and still had the same result; and a poisonous mushroom can be just as healthy as benign one.
You say: (“Hone in” has no meaning.)
In my lexicon, “hone in” means to refine your aim or trajectory.
My point in #25 is just that: “Hone in” is a misreading of “home in” (“to target”). You can hone something, such as a tool or a skill, but you can’t hone in on something.
How about alot, which should be a lot? We don’t spell alittle, so why do folks spell alot?
My pet peeve is everyday and every day. Every day is describing something that happens daily-I go to work every day. Everyday is an adjective- I wore my everyday shoes instead of my good shoes.
I love this list. I have printed it and intend to give it to the English teacher I’m currently assisting as an aide. She’s absolutely incapable of explaining these differences to her students. I don’t know how many times I’ve heard her say “because that’s just the way it is.” It’s awful.
On a side note, I always have a silent laugh when people complain of being nauseous, rather than nauseated.
Mine is when people complain “of” something instead of complaining about it. But I can be rather nauseous to some. 🙂
I was very surprised not to see affect/effect on here. Even I get them confused most of the time.
You didn’t discuss the difference between more than (opposite of fewer!) and over (a location) Not only didn’t you discuss it – you have the misuse of “over” on your page in the add for subscribing to your site. You can have more than 50,000 people subscribe to your site … or you can hover over a football stadium filled with more than 50,000 people.
The *add* for subscribing to the site? You can have an ad- vertisement for your site…o you can have something that is an add-ition of some kind for your site, I suppose. Or maybe add itself is a noun we aren’t aware of…:)
Shannon: And don’t forget *iffect*– what would possibly happen if something affected something else, and *offect*– what happens when the affect is effectively to knock off something that was, theretofore, on.
When does one use ‘timely’ and when is it appropriate to use ‘timeously’?
I have no idea; I speak and write American English and had never heard of this word until I saw it in your comment. According to Merriam-Webster Online, it’s a direct synonym of timely used primarily in Scotland and South Africa; perhaps a site visitor from one of those countries can enlighten you about any nuance.
Eldergee, that would be always and never, respectively.
After I had just started with an engineering firm I found “gravely” instead of “gravelly” on one of their report figures to describe soil with gravel. It had been used for at least 10 years and hundreds of reports.
I brought it to the attention to the senior engineer, who minored in English. He was “gravely” disappointed.
This is really helpful! I am a trancriptionist and run into affect vs effect often. This is the most complete list I have seen like this. Thanks for putting it together!!!
Tom: I can symphatize. I work at a university and I found that their commencement programs had referred to the Grand *Marshall* of the ceremony for at least 15 years. I pointed this out to the head of the English Dept, and he didn’t even see the problem. I was the one gravely disappointed!
Hysterical / Hilarious:
Being Hysterical is someone who is emotionally uncontrollable and / or panicking physically. Chicken Little was hysterical when he ran around yelling “The sky is falling!”
Being Hilarious is funny beyond humorous. Robin Williams live on stage (or pretty much any time he is turned “on”) can be hilarious to the point no one in their right mind is not weeping with hilarity.
One can be both hysterical and hilarious, but the words are NOT interchangeable, despite common misuse by the general public and the media.
Deborah K. Mitchell
Great tips for teachers and parents too! Will use them in my class. Thank you!
Another one to consider for the next fifty:
alternately / alternatively
One is taken in turn, the other is a separate proposed option.