<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When to Form a Plural with an Apostrophe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-194696</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=2571#comment-194696</guid>
		<description>I am grammatically challenged but,

its -possessive 
it&#039;s - it is

contradicts the possessive rules, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am grammatically challenged but,</p>
<p>its -possessive<br />
it&#8217;s &#8211; it is</p>
<p>contradicts the possessive rules, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beverly</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-183627</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=2571#comment-183627</guid>
		<description>How seemingly simple, to eradicate apostrophe abuses by abolishing it! What is so difficult about understanding possessions and contractions? What is so difficult about understanding singular and pleural?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How seemingly simple, to eradicate apostrophe abuses by abolishing it! What is so difficult about understanding possessions and contractions? What is so difficult about understanding singular and pleural?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-181268</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=2571#comment-181268</guid>
		<description>As an irritatingly pedantic professional writer, it is a great relief to find a website where I can vent my frustrations.  

I know I&#039;m coming late to this conversation, but I really wanted to add that I recently had the same thought myself: it&#039;s hopeless trying to save the apostrophe from its ubiquitous/iniquitous abuse.  Better to simply abolish it.  

The difference between &#039;the boys books&#039; and &#039;the boys books&#039; would be obvious from the context, and if it weren&#039;t, a small effort would make it obvious.  The apostrophe today is like a hangnail - we only notice it when it snags on something and then it hurts like hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an irritatingly pedantic professional writer, it is a great relief to find a website where I can vent my frustrations.  </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m coming late to this conversation, but I really wanted to add that I recently had the same thought myself: it&#8217;s hopeless trying to save the apostrophe from its ubiquitous/iniquitous abuse.  Better to simply abolish it.  </p>
<p>The difference between &#8216;the boys books&#8217; and &#8216;the boys books&#8217; would be obvious from the context, and if it weren&#8217;t, a small effort would make it obvious.  The apostrophe today is like a hangnail &#8211; we only notice it when it snags on something and then it hurts like hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randell</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-160888</link>
		<dc:creator>Randell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=2571#comment-160888</guid>
		<description>What is the plural form of the grades A-, A+, B+, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the plural form of the grades A-, A+, B+, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/when-to-form-a-plural-with-an-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-159193</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=2571#comment-159193</guid>
		<description>As late as the mid 1980s, in some cases, the standard use of &quot;byte&quot; didn&#039;t mean 8 bits (except in IBM, where the &quot;8 bit&quot; definition originates).  MS Windows (really, IBM x86 compatible processors) uses a 32 or 64 bit &lt;i&gt;word&lt;/i&gt; size, but the addressing unit is still 8 bits; but older computers often had an &lt;i&gt;addressing unit&lt;/i&gt; of different width (the last one I know of to use a non-8-bit &quot;byte&quot; size was the last generation of Lisp Machine hardware, the Symbolics Ivory processor, using 48-bit bytes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As late as the mid 1980s, in some cases, the standard use of &#8220;byte&#8221; didn&#8217;t mean 8 bits (except in IBM, where the &#8220;8 bit&#8221; definition originates).  MS Windows (really, IBM x86 compatible processors) uses a 32 or 64 bit <i>word</i> size, but the addressing unit is still 8 bits; but older computers often had an <i>addressing unit</i> of different width (the last one I know of to use a non-8-bit &#8220;byte&#8221; size was the last generation of Lisp Machine hardware, the Symbolics Ivory processor, using 48-bit bytes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
