<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verbification at Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric C</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-211976</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3912#comment-211976</guid>
		<description>depends on how it rolls off the tongue. Healthify makes me want to throw up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depends on how it rolls off the tongue. Healthify makes me want to throw up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Precise Edit</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-211562</link>
		<dc:creator>Precise Edit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3912#comment-211562</guid>
		<description>&quot;Beautify&quot; is common, &quot;uglify&quot; less so. But if one is acceptable, why not the other?

On the other hand, I will resist &quot;fryify,&quot; which, I suppose, is the action of making something fried. The problem here is making a new verb form from an existing verb.

Ain&#039;t language fun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Beautify&#8221; is common, &#8220;uglify&#8221; less so. But if one is acceptable, why not the other?</p>
<p>On the other hand, I will resist &#8220;fryify,&#8221; which, I suppose, is the action of making something fried. The problem here is making a new verb form from an existing verb.</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t language fun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen POWELL</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-211345</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen POWELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3912#comment-211345</guid>
		<description>Your item on the word &quot;healthify&quot; reminds me of my dislike for food that is described as &quot;healthy&quot; when I feel that &quot;healthful&quot; should be used.
Yes, the chicken looked very healthy when it was running round the farmer&#039;s yard, but now that it sits fully cooked on the table I prefer to think of how healthful it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your item on the word &#8220;healthify&#8221; reminds me of my dislike for food that is described as &#8220;healthy&#8221; when I feel that &#8220;healthful&#8221; should be used.<br />
Yes, the chicken looked very healthy when it was running round the farmer&#8217;s yard, but now that it sits fully cooked on the table I prefer to think of how healthful it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernadette</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-211281</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernadette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3912#comment-211281</guid>
		<description>Is it all a case of laziness, or is it a case of trying to &#039;sound important&#039;, or a little bit of both?

Either way, I&#039;ll take the extra couple of seconds and formulate a sentence instead of making up a word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it all a case of laziness, or is it a case of trying to &#8216;sound important&#8217;, or a little bit of both?</p>
<p>Either way, I&#8217;ll take the extra couple of seconds and formulate a sentence instead of making up a word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbification-at-work/comment-page-1/#comment-210901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3912#comment-210901</guid>
		<description>In time, perhaps use of &lt;em&gt;&quot;friendify&quot;&lt;/em&gt; instead of &quot;befriend&quot; will die out. 

Language evolvifies and adaptifies with the times.

I&#039;m sure there was much wailifying and gnashification of teeth (gnashifying?) when the verbs &lt;em&gt;&quot;to telex&quot;&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;&quot;to fax&quot;&lt;/em&gt; entered the language.

Both are fadifying away into archaic relics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In time, perhaps use of <em>&#8220;friendify&#8221;</em> instead of &#8220;befriend&#8221; will die out. </p>
<p>Language evolvifies and adaptifies with the times.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there was much wailifying and gnashification of teeth (gnashifying?) when the verbs <em>&#8220;to telex&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;to fax&#8221;</em> entered the language.</p>
<p>Both are fadifying away into archaic relics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 08:52:05 -->
