<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Titled versus Entitled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/titled-versus-entitled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/titled-versus-entitled/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/titled-versus-entitled/comment-page-1/#comment-159014</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/titled-versus-entitled/#comment-159014</guid>
		<description>Claiming that you have rarely seen it done is not a good argument that it can or should not be done. According to the dictionary definition of &quot;entitled&quot;, I see no reason why your opening sentence needs to be changed. While I do agree that there is a stylistic convention, you seem to be arguing that it&#039;s more of a black and white matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Claiming that you have rarely seen it done is not a good argument that it can or should not be done. According to the dictionary definition of &#8220;entitled&#8221;, I see no reason why your opening sentence needs to be changed. While I do agree that there is a stylistic convention, you seem to be arguing that it&#8217;s more of a black and white matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
