<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Serial Comma is OK with Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:55:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-210403</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3880#comment-210403</guid>
		<description>I go with the majority here---I always use the serial comma.  But my example (having to do with screws, washers, and nuts and bolts) is nowhere near as good as those from Miriam and ChrisB, which I had never heard.  I&#039;ll use those when explaining from now on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go with the majority here&#8212;I always use the serial comma.  But my example (having to do with screws, washers, and nuts and bolts) is nowhere near as good as those from Miriam and ChrisB, which I had never heard.  I&#8217;ll use those when explaining from now on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leisureguy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-210339</link>
		<dc:creator>Leisureguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3880#comment-210339</guid>
		<description>Serial comma always. I used to keep a little list of ambiguities that result from its omission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serial comma always. I used to keep a little list of ambiguities that result from its omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-210026</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3880#comment-210026</guid>
		<description>I use the serial comma - always have and always will. In fact, it annoys me to no end when others don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the serial comma &#8211; always have and always will. In fact, it annoys me to no end when others don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-209965</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3880#comment-209965</guid>
		<description>In the course of your well-honed article is the comment, &quot;CMOS observes that the usage is &#039;blessed by Fowler&#039; among other authorities. However, when I looked up the topic in Fowler (1965 edition) I found this remark, which seems neutral at best...&quot;

I think that a reference to &quot;Fowler,&quot; with no other qualification, as in &quot;blessed by Fowler,&quot; should be reserved for the original 1926 edition. The 1965 second edition that the article cites and that some modern authorities prefer, is partly Gowers.

On that view, &quot;Fowler&#039;s&quot; recommendation is firm and clear: &quot;The only rule that will obviate such uncertainties [which he enumerates in the previous paragraphs] is that after every item including the last, unless a heavier stop is needed for independent reasons, the  comma should be used....&quot;

Despite Sir Ernest&#039;s seeming neutrality and the recent preference for light punctuation, those of us who were weaned on &quot;Fowler&quot; (1926) have followed  his recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the course of your well-honed article is the comment, &#8220;CMOS observes that the usage is &#8216;blessed by Fowler&#8217; among other authorities. However, when I looked up the topic in Fowler (1965 edition) I found this remark, which seems neutral at best&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that a reference to &#8220;Fowler,&#8221; with no other qualification, as in &#8220;blessed by Fowler,&#8221; should be reserved for the original 1926 edition. The 1965 second edition that the article cites and that some modern authorities prefer, is partly Gowers.</p>
<p>On that view, &#8220;Fowler&#8217;s&#8221; recommendation is firm and clear: &#8220;The only rule that will obviate such uncertainties [which he enumerates in the previous paragraphs] is that after every item including the last, unless a heavier stop is needed for independent reasons, the  comma should be used&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite Sir Ernest&#8217;s seeming neutrality and the recent preference for light punctuation, those of us who were weaned on &#8220;Fowler&#8221; (1926) have followed  his recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peggye</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-serial-comma-is-ok-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-209920</link>
		<dc:creator>Peggye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3880#comment-209920</guid>
		<description>I just read Deborah&#039;s comments about newspaper print, so it sounds like these publishers have played a role in killing serial commas.  I have often tried to remember what were the newspapers&#039; practices when I was growing up. I tend to think they must have used serial commas a few decades ago, as I would have noticed that the newsprint I was reading was far different from what I was being taught. I often mentally thank my many teachers  who were relentless in their desire to impart proper grammer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read Deborah&#8217;s comments about newspaper print, so it sounds like these publishers have played a role in killing serial commas.  I have often tried to remember what were the newspapers&#8217; practices when I was growing up. I tend to think they must have used serial commas a few decades ago, as I would have noticed that the newsprint I was reading was far different from what I was being taught. I often mentally thank my many teachers  who were relentless in their desire to impart proper grammer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->