<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Possessive Apostrophe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:28:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-223753</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/#comment-223753</guid>
		<description>In the dim light one might look like one’s son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the dim light one might look like one’s son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-223235</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/#comment-223235</guid>
		<description>Just wondering which is correct (is &#039;one&#039; a pronoun)?

In the dim light one might look like ones son.
In the dim light one might look like one&#039;s son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering which is correct (is &#8216;one&#8217; a pronoun)?</p>
<p>In the dim light one might look like ones son.<br />
In the dim light one might look like one&#8217;s son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddd</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-217509</link>
		<dc:creator>ddd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/#comment-217509</guid>
		<description>Traditionally it was Jesus&#039; and Moses&#039; and Socrates&#039; and Pythagoras&#039; and Sisyphus&#039; and so on and so forth for every other name that ends in an &#039;esse&#039; sound. 

That Jesus&#039;s exists is an aberration of language indicative of the grand lack of historical sense that belies all faith in a Christian God in 2010.

But either are correct: here&#039;s a post from another website.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Believe it or not, native speakers are often unsure of this; and there&#039;s no agreed &quot;right&quot; way to do it.

My personal preference is to write -s&#039;s, since it&#039;s generally pronounced with an extra syllable: &quot;Jesus&#039;s&quot; is pronounced with three syllables.

However, many people consider this incorrect, and say you should simply add the apostrophe: Jesus&#039;.

Just how much disagreement there is over this is evident when you consider that in London there is a St Thomas&#039; Hospital and a St James&#039;s Park. A quick Google search also reveals a large number of educational establishments which have apparently given up on the question and call themselves St Thomas University (Miami Gardens, Florida and Fredericton, New Brunswick) or University of St Thomas (St Paul, Minnesota and Houston, Texas) -- the former, of course, will give a lot of grammar sticklers indigestion.

One author, giving advice to budding writers, recommended avoiding giving characters any names that end in -s, simply to sidestep the issue altogether.

So use one or the other, but be consistent -- always -s&#039; or always -s&#039;s.

Of course, with Jesus, there is one other option available: the old-fashioned variant &quot;Jesu&quot;. However, I wouldn&#039;t recommend it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally it was Jesus&#8217; and Moses&#8217; and Socrates&#8217; and Pythagoras&#8217; and Sisyphus&#8217; and so on and so forth for every other name that ends in an &#8216;esse&#8217; sound. </p>
<p>That Jesus&#8217;s exists is an aberration of language indicative of the grand lack of historical sense that belies all faith in a Christian God in 2010.</p>
<p>But either are correct: here&#8217;s a post from another website.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Believe it or not, native speakers are often unsure of this; and there&#8217;s no agreed &#8220;right&#8221; way to do it.</p>
<p>My personal preference is to write -s&#8217;s, since it&#8217;s generally pronounced with an extra syllable: &#8220;Jesus&#8217;s&#8221; is pronounced with three syllables.</p>
<p>However, many people consider this incorrect, and say you should simply add the apostrophe: Jesus&#8217;.</p>
<p>Just how much disagreement there is over this is evident when you consider that in London there is a St Thomas&#8217; Hospital and a St James&#8217;s Park. A quick Google search also reveals a large number of educational establishments which have apparently given up on the question and call themselves St Thomas University (Miami Gardens, Florida and Fredericton, New Brunswick) or University of St Thomas (St Paul, Minnesota and Houston, Texas) &#8212; the former, of course, will give a lot of grammar sticklers indigestion.</p>
<p>One author, giving advice to budding writers, recommended avoiding giving characters any names that end in -s, simply to sidestep the issue altogether.</p>
<p>So use one or the other, but be consistent &#8212; always -s&#8217; or always -s&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Of course, with Jesus, there is one other option available: the old-fashioned variant &#8220;Jesu&#8221;. However, I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-214192</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/#comment-214192</guid>
		<description>Jayden,

I never knew that &quot;ancient proper names are the exception&quot; to the rules. Perhaps, though I haven&#039;t seen this in any style guide.

Orville,

It is actually very simple. If you pronounce &quot;esses&quot; at the end, as you would if you said Jesus&#039;s, then you put an &quot;s&quot; after the apostrophe.

If you don&#039;t pronounce &quot;esses&quot; at the end, as in Marys&#039;, you don&#039;t put an &quot;s&quot; after the the apostrophe.

What you have proposed would cause more confusion as it would further divorce written language from speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayden,</p>
<p>I never knew that &#8220;ancient proper names are the exception&#8221; to the rules. Perhaps, though I haven&#8217;t seen this in any style guide.</p>
<p>Orville,</p>
<p>It is actually very simple. If you pronounce &#8220;esses&#8221; at the end, as you would if you said Jesus&#8217;s, then you put an &#8220;s&#8221; after the apostrophe.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t pronounce &#8220;esses&#8221; at the end, as in Marys&#8217;, you don&#8217;t put an &#8220;s&#8221; after the the apostrophe.</p>
<p>What you have proposed would cause more confusion as it would further divorce written language from speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orville gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/comment-page-1/#comment-213904</link>
		<dc:creator>orville gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-possessive-apostrophe/#comment-213904</guid>
		<description>&quot;JESUS&#039;S words &quot; is awkward  as used in worship, bible study, etc.

&quot;JESUS&#039;  words &quot;  is so much more simple and and easy for communication.

ok:   Alice&#039;s words   Alice&#039;s shoes

difficult: Alias&#039;s   words   

simple &amp; easy: Alias&#039;   shoes

CAN YOU PROMOTE  simplicity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;JESUS&#8217;S words &#8221; is awkward  as used in worship, bible study, etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;JESUS&#8217;  words &#8221;  is so much more simple and and easy for communication.</p>
<p>ok:   Alice&#8217;s words   Alice&#8217;s shoes</p>
<p>difficult: Alias&#8217;s   words   </p>
<p>simple &amp; easy: Alias&#8217;   shoes</p>
<p>CAN YOU PROMOTE  simplicity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->