<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The -escent Suffix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/comment-page-1/#comment-53094</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=952#comment-53094</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I guess in this case the fluorescing is due to electric current applied directly, rather than radiation impacting a fluorescing material&lt;/i&gt;
No; the light comes from the coating on the inside of the tube - if you made a fluorescent lamp with a plain glass tube, you&#039;d get very little visible light (just a dull blue glow; it&#039;s mostly ultraviolet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I guess in this case the fluorescing is due to electric current applied directly, rather than radiation impacting a fluorescing material</i><br />
No; the light comes from the coating on the inside of the tube &#8211; if you made a fluorescent lamp with a plain glass tube, you&#8217;d get very little visible light (just a dull blue glow; it&#8217;s mostly ultraviolet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/comment-page-1/#comment-44123</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=952#comment-44123</guid>
		<description>Ah, a fellow trivia junkie. It&#039;s fun to find out new things, isn&#039;t it, impNERD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a fellow trivia junkie. It&#8217;s fun to find out new things, isn&#8217;t it, impNERD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impNERD</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/comment-page-1/#comment-43972</link>
		<dc:creator>impNERD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=952#comment-43972</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty awesome. I love little nuggets of facts like this. Many times in elementary school or younger I would ask tons of questions like the one your son did. And most of the times I would never receive the answers... I can see myself doing exactly what you said. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty awesome. I love little nuggets of facts like this. Many times in elementary school or younger I would ask tons of questions like the one your son did. And most of the times I would never receive the answers&#8230; I can see myself doing exactly what you said. <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/comment-page-1/#comment-43643</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=952#comment-43643</guid>
		<description>Leisureguy: yes, it&#039;s a very useful prefix.

Cmdweb: I tend to use &#039;becoming obsolete&#039; myself, as it&#039;s clear what it means. Still nice to know the other word, though. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leisureguy: yes, it&#8217;s a very useful prefix.</p>
<p>Cmdweb: I tend to use &#8216;becoming obsolete&#8217; myself, as it&#8217;s clear what it means. Still nice to know the other word, though. <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmdweb</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-escent-suffix/comment-page-1/#comment-43626</link>
		<dc:creator>cmdweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=952#comment-43626</guid>
		<description>Obsolescent.  I had an argument quite a while back about that word.  I argued that it wasn&#039;t a word, it was just people&#039;s ba5tardisation of the word &#039;obsolescence&#039;, and what they really wanted to use was the word &#039;obsolete&#039;.  I had honestly not heard of the word until then.  Needless to say when the dictionary came out, I climbed down...
Note to self: engage brain and check dictionary before arguing.
I still refuse to use it.  I always prefer to write &#039;becoming obsolete&#039; as I think &#039;obsolescence&#039; has no place in my writing even though it&#039;s very widely used in my tech writing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obsolescent.  I had an argument quite a while back about that word.  I argued that it wasn&#8217;t a word, it was just people&#8217;s ba5tardisation of the word &#8216;obsolescence&#8217;, and what they really wanted to use was the word &#8216;obsolete&#8217;.  I had honestly not heard of the word until then.  Needless to say when the dictionary came out, I climbed down&#8230;<br />
Note to self: engage brain and check dictionary before arguing.<br />
I still refuse to use it.  I always prefer to write &#8216;becoming obsolete&#8217; as I think &#8216;obsolescence&#8217; has no place in my writing even though it&#8217;s very widely used in my tech writing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
