Posts By Email
Grab The RSSSubmissions and Submittals
Scott asks:
Would you comment on the differences in the nouns “submittal” and “submission” to denote a document submitted to someone or, perhaps, uploaded to a website? Which is better and under what circumstances? The major sources, Strunk and White, Chicago, for example, don’t mention them. I prefer the concrete submittal because the word submission has so many other meanings, but I’m having a hard time proving it.
The OED has a very meagre entry for the word submittal: “The act of submitting.” It offers a single example, from an American source dated 1888 that refers to “a letter of submittal.”
Merriam-Webster gives the word the same short shrift: “an act of submitting.”
In legal use submission has four possible meanings:
agreement to abide by a decision or to obey an authority
reference to the decision or judgement of a (third) party
the referring of a matter to arbitration
a theory of a case put forward by an advocate
And, of course, submission can mean the action of submitting to a conquering power.
In its well-established general sense, submission means “the act of submitting a matter to a person for decision or consideration.”
Although absent from the two dictionaries cited above, the word submittal does enjoy a specialized use among architects and construction managers. Answers.com offers these definitions:
Submittals in Construction Management are shop drawings, material data, and samples. Product data submittals, samples, and shop drawings are required primarily for the architect and engineer to verify that the correct products will be installed on the project.
Architecture: materials such as samples or manufacturers’ data that are submitted to the architect for approval; usually a requirement of the contract documents.
The reader’s objection to the use of submission is that it has “so many other meanings.” This is not a very strong basis for objection. A great many of the words we use have many meanings. English speakers are used to rolling with the punches. For example, no one is going to misinterpret the meanings of the following sentences:
Caesar sought the submission of the Gauls.
My novel submission has been accepted by Harper-Collins.
Context is all.
Related Articles
Share
Join Over 50,000 Email Subscribers and Get a Free eBook!
- Subscribe to DailyWritingTips.com via email and you'll be able to download our ebook, "Basic English Grammar."
- You will also get all our writing tips delivered to your email inbox, completely free!
- The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).
6 Responses to “Submissions and Submittals”
Have something to say?
Popular Articles
- 40 Yiddish Words You Should Know
- 10 Rules for Writing Numbers
- Vocabulary Test 1
- Passed vs Past
- Writing a Reference Letter
- Creative Writing 101
- 44 Resume Writing Tips
- Among vs. Amongst
- 6 Foreign Expressions You Should Know
- Let the Word Do the Work
- How to Format a US Business Letter
- That vs. Which
- 50 Incorrect Pronunciations To Avoid
- The Writing Process
- Inquire vs. Enquire
- 25 Pieces of Writing Software
- 12 Greek Words You Should Know
- Cannot or Can Not?
- What Does Sic Mean?
- 100 Small But Expressive Interjections
- Wether, Weather, Whether
- 34 Writing Tips To Write Better
- Yours Faithfully or Yours Sincerely?
- Latin Words and Expressions
- Grammar Test 1
- Program vs. Programme
- Writing Prompts 101
- 7 Essay Writing Tips To Ace Your Exam
- What Is Irony? (With Examples)
- 100 Beautiful and Ugly Words
- 7 Grammatical Errors That Aren't
Actually. . .I read “novel submission” as “unusual submission”–so it is possible to misinterpret that latter sentence. But why even include “submission” in it? “My novel has been accepted by Harper Collins” is surely sufficient?
I see that my example is ambiguous, but I believe that my point about submission vs submittal remains unchanged.
@Kathryn: Surely submitting a novel to a publisher is very different from the publisher accepting it?
Grr. If only one could edit one’s posts. Sorry, Kathryn, I entirely agree with you. (I read the post earlier and just checked in for comments without rereading the original post carefully enough. Lesson learned.)
Grin–agreed, Maeve, your point was clear. . .and valid. And, Cecily, yes, I am told that there is a huge difference between submitting it to the publisher and having it accepted by the publisher. As I haven’t a creative bone in my body, it’s not something I’ll ever experience for myself, but I gather that having it accepted is downright intoxicating.
Nice piece. Perhaps because of architects’ usage, those applying for land use approvals make “submittals”.