Short clauses can take commas

Ron Milan wants to use a comma to separate two short clauses:

I wrote a sentence:
“Experts teach, peers comfort.”

Word creates an error unless I write
“Experts teach and peers comfort.”
or
“Experts teach; peers comfort.” (semi colon versus comma).  

However, I like the shorter pause by a comma.  Any rules on this?

Punctuation exists to help readers make sense of what is written, but it can also be a means of helping a reader hear the writer’s voice.

The difference between Ron’s preferred sentence and those suggested by Word is a difference of style. All three sentences are understandable, but the first conveys an introspective tone that the others lack.

Julius Caesar’s boast of Veni, vidi, vici is usually translated as I came, I saw, I conquered. The insertion of an and or of semicolons would spoil the effect by slowing it down or making it sound more prosaic than triumphant.

The Chicago Manual of Style staunchly defends the semicolon to separate independent clauses not joined by a conjunction:

Two independent clauses not joined by a conjunction are best separated by a semicolon or a period. This principle has always been the fifth major rule put forth in The Elements of Style—starting with Strunk’s original (Ithaca, NY, 1918) and continuing almost unchanged . . . through the latest (fourth) edition of Strunk and White (New York, 2000).

Strunk, however, doesn’t get the last word, not even in the offices of the CMS. When a writer queried about using a comma instead of a semicolon in a sentence with two independent clauses and no conjunction, the response was that the sentence in question did, in fact, read better with the comma. The CMS editor acknowledged that

[s]ometimes the ear is more important than the rulebook.

When choosing whether to use a comma or a semicolon, the writer must consider both clarity and desired stylistic effect.

Here’s an interesting About article on the semicolon

P.S. I just discovered that the National Geographic Manual of Style supports the comma for short clauses and no conjunction. Their example is also the Julius Caesar quotation. (Item 5)

Got Your Free eBook?


  • Subscribe to Daily Writing Tips and you will be able to download our free ebook: Basic English Grammar.
  • You will also get all our grammar, spelling, punctuation and writing tips.
  • The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).

5 Responses to “Short clauses can take commas”

  1. Brad K. on August 25, 2009 2:51 am

    I noticed that I often separate clauses with a comma.

    But it appears that I am thinking in terms of verse, rather than sentences, and the commas at time provide the poetic completion of expression.

    I came
    I saw
    I conquered.

    How poetic.

    I guess I need to time my poetry, or quit timing my prose.

    I have heard poetry referred to as “higher information density” than prose.

    I have problems with the generalization
    Experts teach,
    peers comfort.”

    But the poetry and symmetry come through loud and clear.

    Brad K.

  2. Derrick Grant on August 25, 2009 10:37 am

    Gotta go semicolon in this case – my opinion.

  3. Deborah H on August 25, 2009 1:27 pm

    I confess, I do this.
    I confess—sometimes I do this instead.

  4. PreciseEdit on August 28, 2009 3:53 pm

    For a series of short independent clauses with parallel structure (as in the Caesar example), we sometimes allow the comma.

    However, if the commas are not necessary to create a particular tone, or if the clauses are not in a series, or if the clauses are not parallel, we prefer the semi-colon, a comma with a conjunction, or a period, depending on the context.

  5. tanuja on October 18, 2009 1:57 pm

    please tell me how to solve the phrases and the clauses

Got something to say?





Sponsors

Self Publish Your Book! time tracking and invoicing for freelancers Be Your Own Editor - Buy The Book Now Advertise Here!

Recent Articles