<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running &#8220;Toward&#8221; the House, or &#8220;Towards&#8221; the House?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jjhausman</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-394229</link>
		<dc:creator>jjhausman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1890#comment-394229</guid>
		<description>As long as the reader understands what you&#039;re trying to say, what does it matter, the sultry little nuances of grammar?  I come from the school where rules are made to be broken, where language is constantly in flux (from Old English to Middle English to current form).  Good to have a standard, sure, but how do scholars explain regional dialects?  Language isn&#039;t written with a ruler and compass.  It&#039;s not a mathematical equation.  It&#039;s closer to a seance.  Anything goes, even speaking in tongues, as long as the reader gets moved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the reader understands what you&#8217;re trying to say, what does it matter, the sultry little nuances of grammar?  I come from the school where rules are made to be broken, where language is constantly in flux (from Old English to Middle English to current form).  Good to have a standard, sure, but how do scholars explain regional dialects?  Language isn&#8217;t written with a ruler and compass.  It&#8217;s not a mathematical equation.  It&#8217;s closer to a seance.  Anything goes, even speaking in tongues, as long as the reader gets moved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Barnidge</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-392526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Barnidge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 14:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1890#comment-392526</guid>
		<description>Chris, your clarification on the British uses of &quot;toward&quot; and &quot;towards&quot; is very interesting and informative, and soothes my frazzled nerves over the use of &quot;towards&quot; by our friends on your isle.  However, I will stick with proper American English and continue to cringe every time one of my fellow countrymen uses it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, your clarification on the British uses of &#8220;toward&#8221; and &#8220;towards&#8221; is very interesting and informative, and soothes my frazzled nerves over the use of &#8220;towards&#8221; by our friends on your isle.  However, I will stick with proper American English and continue to cringe every time one of my fellow countrymen uses it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Colton</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-390961</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Colton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1890#comment-390961</guid>
		<description>Please forgive the typographical errors in my previous submission..!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please forgive the typographical errors in my previous submission..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Colton</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-390960</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Colton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1890#comment-390960</guid>
		<description>This thread emphasises the English/American divide. I have just discoverd this web site and am fascinated. As a very experienced editor of English texts, I have come to rwalise that my native language, English English, is so very different from the tongue of my transatlantic friends. May I be permitted to intrude into your American conversation and interpolate an English viewpoint?
Towards implies direction and is a preposition
Toward is an adjective meaning appropriate, or acceptable - opposite is untoward.
That is the English orthodoxy, albeit misundrstood in America.
Another example is forwards, versus forward: the former is a directional preposition, the latter is an adjective meaning precocious, or self-
promoting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread emphasises the English/American divide. I have just discoverd this web site and am fascinated. As a very experienced editor of English texts, I have come to rwalise that my native language, English English, is so very different from the tongue of my transatlantic friends. May I be permitted to intrude into your American conversation and interpolate an English viewpoint?<br />
Towards implies direction and is a preposition<br />
Toward is an adjective meaning appropriate, or acceptable &#8211; opposite is untoward.<br />
That is the English orthodoxy, albeit misundrstood in America.<br />
Another example is forwards, versus forward: the former is a directional preposition, the latter is an adjective meaning precocious, or self-<br />
promoting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/running-toward-the-house-or-towards-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-390412</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1890#comment-390412</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Joe above, and what I&#039;ve read here on the topic of toward/towards has rocked my world -- and I fear I may not be able to sleep tonight. I have always thought that &quot;towards&quot; was simply a result of some uneducated wrinkle developing in the pronunciation and use of the word &quot;toward.&quot; Why on earth would an s ever need to be added to this perfectly well-functioning word to begin with? Can we also add an s to countless other prepositions like to, over, through, above and along??? Why wouldn&#039;t we? As Joe implies (I think), there isn&#039;t much reason to have an &quot;either way goes&quot; approach to this, at least in my book (which I have yet to write). Aside from any historical development of the word &quot;towards&quot; -- and heck, even if it does help to legitimize the word&#039;s use -- &quot;towards&quot; is just an annoyance to me and will never ever seem correct -- when the word &quot;toward&quot; does the just quite sufficiently, thank you. Time for my pill....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Joe above, and what I&#8217;ve read here on the topic of toward/towards has rocked my world &#8212; and I fear I may not be able to sleep tonight. I have always thought that &#8220;towards&#8221; was simply a result of some uneducated wrinkle developing in the pronunciation and use of the word &#8220;toward.&#8221; Why on earth would an s ever need to be added to this perfectly well-functioning word to begin with? Can we also add an s to countless other prepositions like to, over, through, above and along??? Why wouldn&#8217;t we? As Joe implies (I think), there isn&#8217;t much reason to have an &#8220;either way goes&#8221; approach to this, at least in my book (which I have yet to write). Aside from any historical development of the word &#8220;towards&#8221; &#8212; and heck, even if it does help to legitimize the word&#8217;s use &#8212; &#8220;towards&#8221; is just an annoyance to me and will never ever seem correct &#8212; when the word &#8220;toward&#8221; does the just quite sufficiently, thank you. Time for my pill&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 20:12:31 -->
