<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orwell: Timeless Guidelines for Writers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecily</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-388639</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/#comment-388639</guid>
		<description>I think the crucial thing that people often overlook is the first word of the essay’s title: “Politics”.

If people remember that, and actually read the whole essay, they will see that Orwell makes valid points how language is manipulated to deceive and mislead. His six suggestions are to help people write plainly to avoid being misunderstood.

The problem comes when people think these suggestions apply to ALL forms of writing, even fiction. You only have to skim Orwell’s own works to see that was not his intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the crucial thing that people often overlook is the first word of the essay’s title: “Politics”.</p>
<p>If people remember that, and actually read the whole essay, they will see that Orwell makes valid points how language is manipulated to deceive and mislead. His six suggestions are to help people write plainly to avoid being misunderstood.</p>
<p>The problem comes when people think these suggestions apply to ALL forms of writing, even fiction. You only have to skim Orwell’s own works to see that was not his intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: July 2007 &#171; M. J. Maddox</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-38031</link>
		<dc:creator>July 2007 &#171; M. J. Maddox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/#comment-38031</guid>
		<description>[...] 28: Who Is My Neighbor? * 26: Orwell: Timeless Guidelines for Writers * 24: Folks versus People * 24: English Spelling is Not Total Chaos * 19: “Putting on Airs” or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 28: Who Is My Neighbor? * 26: Orwell: Timeless Guidelines for Writers * 24: Folks versus People * 24: English Spelling is Not Total Chaos * 19: “Putting on Airs” or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-17003</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/#comment-17003</guid>
		<description>In response to Ricardo&#039;s query, here&#039;s what Wikipedia had to say on this point. 

&quot;Early Modern English distinguished between the plural you and the singular thou. This distinction was lost in modern English due to the importation from France of a Romance linguistic feature which is commonly called the T-V distinction. This distinction made the plural forms more respectful and deferential; they were used to address strangers and social superiors. This distinction ultimately led to familiar thou becoming obsolete in standard English (and Dutch), although this did not happen in other languages such as French.&quot;

Interesting!

Cheers, 
Kristina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Ricardo&#8217;s query, here&#8217;s what Wikipedia had to say on this point. </p>
<p>&#8220;Early Modern English distinguished between the plural you and the singular thou. This distinction was lost in modern English due to the importation from France of a Romance linguistic feature which is commonly called the T-V distinction. This distinction made the plural forms more respectful and deferential; they were used to address strangers and social superiors. This distinction ultimately led to familiar thou becoming obsolete in standard English (and Dutch), although this did not happen in other languages such as French.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Kristina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Escritura limpia y honesta seg&#250;n George Orwell</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-2563</link>
		<dc:creator>Escritura limpia y honesta seg&#250;n George Orwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/#comment-2563</guid>
		<description>[...] cierto, he descubierto el ensayo y las 6 reglas a trav&#233;s de Daily Writing Tips, una bit&#225;cora que leo desde hace unas semanas. la autora de la anotaci&#243;n&#8212;que por [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cierto, he descubierto el ensayo y las 6 reglas a trav&#233;s de Daily Writing Tips, una bit&#225;cora que leo desde hace unas semanas. la autora de la anotaci&#243;n&#8212;que por [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No More Used Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>No More Used Cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/orwell-timeless-guidelines-for-writers/#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>[...] Rowan has gathered a fascinating list of very scary euphemisms from serious news stories. Many of the expressions are U.S. coinages. The Pentagon seems to be an especially prolific contributor to the class of words that &#8220;fall upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details.&amp;#8... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rowan has gathered a fascinating list of very scary euphemisms from serious news stories. Many of the expressions are U.S. coinages. The Pentagon seems to be an especially prolific contributor to the class of words that &#8220;fall upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details.&amp;#8&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 19:33:29 -->
