<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O Second Person Singular, Where Art Thou?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:11:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-240470</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/#comment-240470</guid>
		<description>I found this explanation (in Wikipedia) for the use of &#039;thou&#039; in the King James translation of the bible.
&quot;As William Tyndale translated the Bible into English in the early 1500s, he sought to preserve the singular and plural distinctions that he found in his Hebrew and Greek originals. &quot;
This makes sense to me especially when applied to God since Tyndale would have recognised that it is an important Christian concept that God is one not many. 
Thanks for listening. Judith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this explanation (in Wikipedia) for the use of &#8216;thou&#8217; in the King James translation of the bible.<br />
&#8220;As William Tyndale translated the Bible into English in the early 1500s, he sought to preserve the singular and plural distinctions that he found in his Hebrew and Greek originals. &#8221;<br />
This makes sense to me especially when applied to God since Tyndale would have recognised that it is an important Christian concept that God is one not many.<br />
Thanks for listening. Judith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Many Forms of the Verb TO BE</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>The Many Forms of the Verb TO BE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>[...] reading O Second Person Where Art Thou  reader Bill G asks: How can I explain to my students why the singular “you” takes the plural [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading O Second Person Where Art Thou  reader Bill G asks: How can I explain to my students why the singular “you” takes the plural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maeve</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Maeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/#comment-978</guid>
		<description>When plural &quot;you&quot; started being used as a polite singular, the verb &quot;are&quot; was part of the package. 

When singular &quot;Thou art&quot; dropped out to be replaced by &quot;you are,&quot; &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; took on a singular meaning:

&quot;are&quot; IS singular in the sentence &quot;You are my only friend.&quot;  In &quot;You are my only friends,&quot; &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; is plural.

The verb &quot;to be&quot; is complex.  It deserves a post of its own.  I&#039;ll get right on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When plural &#8220;you&#8221; started being used as a polite singular, the verb &#8220;are&#8221; was part of the package. </p>
<p>When singular &#8220;Thou art&#8221; dropped out to be replaced by &#8220;you are,&#8221; <b>are</b> took on a singular meaning:</p>
<p>&#8220;are&#8221; IS singular in the sentence &#8220;You are my only friend.&#8221;  In &#8220;You are my only friends,&#8221; <b>are</b> is plural.</p>
<p>The verb &#8220;to be&#8221; is complex.  It deserves a post of its own.  I&#8217;ll get right on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill G</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-976</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/#comment-976</guid>
		<description>How can I explain to my students why the singular &quot;you&quot; takes the plural verb &quot;are?&quot;  Is there something obvious I am missing?  Even &quot;thou&quot; took &quot;art.&quot;  What is the history of this shift?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I explain to my students why the singular &#8220;you&#8221; takes the plural verb &#8220;are?&#8221;  Is there something obvious I am missing?  Even &#8220;thou&#8221; took &#8220;art.&#8221;  What is the history of this shift?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy W.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/o-second-person-singular-where-art-thou/#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  That truly is all brand new information to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  That truly is all brand new information to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->