<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mind Your -ed&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PreciseEdit</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/comment-page-1/#comment-53073</link>
		<dc:creator>PreciseEdit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/#comment-53073</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I vote for &quot;Mind your Is.&quot; On the other hand, I have enough trouble minding my Ps and Qs. We have an article in our training manual, entitled &quot;End Apostrophe Abuse,&quot; that addresses this topic. Just today, I saw a sign stating, &quot;Firewood&#039;s selled here.&quot; Ack.

Oh, and please don&#039;t get me started on textbooks!

Back on topic (maybe): I have often seen &quot;suppose to&quot; in place of &quot;supposed to.&quot; I wonder if people make this mistake because they do not pronounce the &quot;-ed&quot; sounds (the &quot;-eds&quot;?) when they say &quot;supposed to.&quot; The connection between speaking and writing is very strong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I vote for &#8220;Mind your Is.&#8221; On the other hand, I have enough trouble minding my Ps and Qs. We have an article in our training manual, entitled &#8220;End Apostrophe Abuse,&#8221; that addresses this topic. Just today, I saw a sign stating, &#8220;Firewood&#8217;s selled here.&#8221; Ack.</p>
<p>Oh, and please don&#8217;t get me started on textbooks!</p>
<p>Back on topic (maybe): I have often seen &#8220;suppose to&#8221; in place of &#8220;supposed to.&#8221; I wonder if people make this mistake because they do not pronounce the &#8220;-ed&#8221; sounds (the &#8220;-eds&#8221;?) when they say &#8220;supposed to.&#8221; The connection between speaking and writing is very strong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maeve</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Maeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>Kate,
I suppose you mean that I should have written &lt;i&gt;Mind Your -eds&lt;/i&gt; instead of &lt;i&gt; Mind Your -ed&#039;s&lt;/i&gt;. That would probably have been clear because of the hyphen.  But what if I&#039;d wanted to write about the letter &quot;i&quot;?  What would readers make of &lt;i&gt;Mind Your is&lt;/i&gt;?

We could save much apostrophe confusion by refusing to use an apostrophe to indicate any kind of plural. Usage like the following, however, is very common in textbooks:

&lt;blockquote&gt;There are too many buts&#039;s, and&#039;s, will&#039;s and shall&#039;s in the text. The A&#039;s in the book are too big. The 5&#039;s and 7&#039;s in the book have been printed clearly. ..&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually your remark comes as I&#039;m struggling with this very thing. I frequently write about words and parts of words so I need a clear way to denote their plurals without confusing the reader.  Clearly I can&#039;t write &lt;em&gt;Mind Your is&lt;/em&gt;, but I could write &lt;em&gt;Mind Your &quot;i&quot;s&lt;/em&gt;.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate,<br />
I suppose you mean that I should have written <i>Mind Your -eds</i> instead of <i> Mind Your -ed&#8217;s</i>. That would probably have been clear because of the hyphen.  But what if I&#8217;d wanted to write about the letter &#8220;i&#8221;?  What would readers make of <i>Mind Your is</i>?</p>
<p>We could save much apostrophe confusion by refusing to use an apostrophe to indicate any kind of plural. Usage like the following, however, is very common in textbooks:</p>
<blockquote><p>There are too many buts&#8217;s, and&#8217;s, will&#8217;s and shall&#8217;s in the text. The A&#8217;s in the book are too big. The 5&#8217;s and 7&#8217;s in the book have been printed clearly. ..</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually your remark comes as I&#8217;m struggling with this very thing. I frequently write about words and parts of words so I need a clear way to denote their plurals without confusing the reader.  Clearly I can&#8217;t write <em>Mind Your is</em>, but I could write <em>Mind Your &#8220;i&#8221;s</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Mind Your -ed’s&lt;/i&gt;

Mind your apostrophes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Mind Your -ed’s</i></p>
<p>Mind your apostrophes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Xu</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Xu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 12:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Ops! ed is my biggest problem in writing! :)
Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ops! ed is my biggest problem in writing! <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 05:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/mind-your-eds/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Funny to see a post on this topic now. 

Just a few nights ago my mates and I had an argument over the poker table about the correct past tense of the word &quot;fold&quot;

&quot;Folded&quot; seems to be an accepted word in poker jargon but is this a real word? We couldn&#039;t figure it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny to see a post on this topic now. </p>
<p>Just a few nights ago my mates and I had an argument over the poker table about the correct past tense of the word &#8220;fold&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Folded&#8221; seems to be an accepted word in poker jargon but is this a real word? We couldn&#8217;t figure it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
