Mind Your -ed’s

The English verb ending -ed is a curious construction.

Although always spelled -ed, it has three different pronunciations. Two of them can lead to misspellings:
/ed/ as in faded
/d/ as in turned
/t/ as in wrecked

The suffix -ed is the sign of the past tense. That is, most English verbs form their past tenses by adding -ed. For example, walk/walked, love/loved, sneeze/sneezed. The same ending marks the simple past tense and the perfect: Yesterday I walked. I have walked for hours.

In earlier periods, English verbs presented more variety in the way they formed the simple past and the past participle. A few of the older forms survive in what the grammar books call “irregular” verbs. These verbs do not form their past tenses by adding -ed:

sing sang (have) sung
give gave (have) given
write wrote (have) written

These “irregular” verbs are sometimes called “strong” verbs. Once very numerous in English, only a few survive–fewer than 70. Many of them, like help, became -ed verbs long ago so we no longer say holp or holpen. Some of the survivors, like wake and dive, are in the process of changing and the old and new forms are both in use:

He woke the baby. or He waked the baby.
He dove from the top board. or He dived into the pool.

One changing form that makes me sad is “slayed” for “slew.” The characters on Buffy the Vampire Slayer made the -ed form current. My view is that “slay” is an old-fashioned word that deserves old-fashioned past forms. If I ever slay a vampire, I will say that I have slain it, and I want the reporters to say that I slew it.

And speaking of “old-fashioned,” don’t commit the error of leaving off the -ed when it is called for. Don’t write “old-fashion girl” for “old-fashioned girl,” or “I was suppose to go home early” for “I was supposed to go home early.”

Got Your Free eBook?


  • Subscribe to Daily Writing Tips and you will be able to download our free ebook: Basic English Grammar.
  • You will also get all our grammar, spelling, punctuation and writing tips.
  • The download link will go along with the first email (you might need to wait up to 24 hours).

9 Responses to “Mind Your -ed’s”

  1. temp on July 5, 2007 1:01 pm

    excelent!

  2. Daniel on July 5, 2007 3:49 pm

    Interesting about the forms that are changing like woke and waked.

  3. john card on July 6, 2007 2:50 am

    hi team:

    i’ve been reading daily writing tips from the beginning and enjoy most all of your posts. I particularly enjoyed the “mind your ed’s” post. I learned a lot from it. I wanted to write to you and tell you that you inspired me to start a blog of my own about sex, love and fantasy. I’m hoping to build it into something special and I’m really excited about its potential. I’m looking forward to your next post. There is one request i have, please don’t make your post soooooooooo long, i only have so much time after a long day at work. Thanks, john card.

  4. Daniel on July 6, 2007 10:14 am

    John, got it! Thanks for the nice words.

  5. Andy on July 7, 2007 5:44 am

    Funny to see a post on this topic now.

    Just a few nights ago my mates and I had an argument over the poker table about the correct past tense of the word “fold”

    “Folded” seems to be an accepted word in poker jargon but is this a real word? We couldn’t figure it out!

  6. Ken Xu on July 7, 2007 12:05 pm

    Ops! ed is my biggest problem in writing! :)
    Thanks for sharing.

  7. Kate on September 28, 2007 2:42 pm

    Mind Your -ed’s

    Mind your apostrophes..

  8. Maeve on September 29, 2007 11:51 pm

    Kate,
    I suppose you mean that I should have written Mind Your -eds instead of Mind Your -ed’s. That would probably have been clear because of the hyphen. But what if I’d wanted to write about the letter “i”? What would readers make of Mind Your is?

    We could save much apostrophe confusion by refusing to use an apostrophe to indicate any kind of plural. Usage like the following, however, is very common in textbooks:

    There are too many buts’s, and’s, will’s and shall’s in the text. The A’s in the book are too big. The 5’s and 7’s in the book have been printed clearly. ..

    Actually your remark comes as I’m struggling with this very thing. I frequently write about words and parts of words so I need a clear way to denote their plurals without confusing the reader. Clearly I can’t write Mind Your is, but I could write Mind Your “i”s.

  9. PreciseEdit on November 11, 2008 3:53 am

    For what it’s worth, I vote for “Mind your Is.” On the other hand, I have enough trouble minding my Ps and Qs. We have an article in our training manual, entitled “End Apostrophe Abuse,” that addresses this topic. Just today, I saw a sign stating, “Firewood’s selled here.” Ack.

    Oh, and please don’t get me started on textbooks!

    Back on topic (maybe): I have often seen “suppose to” in place of “supposed to.” I wonder if people make this mistake because they do not pronounce the “-ed” sounds (the “-eds”?) when they say “supposed to.” The connection between speaking and writing is very strong.

Got something to say?





Recent Articles