<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malapropisms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/comment-page-1/#comment-50289</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/#comment-50289</guid>
		<description>Karl, 

The first sentence uses a non-essential clause, the second an essential clause. Both are grammatically correct but the emphasis does change slightly. 

I possibly prefer your revision but you can&#039;t state which is wrong or right as I&#039;m stating an opinion, so the importance of the sub clause to the first part of the sentence is really up to me.


Anyway, it really isn&#039;t worth worrying about...

&#039;[P]eople are confused about which and that... This isn’t surprising, as there has been a shift in usage over the past century or so and older guides give different advice from newer ones... If you wish to write naturally, don’t fuss too much about the usage of that versus which. Obsessive correction (sarcastically called a which hunt) is best avoided&#039; (http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl, </p>
<p>The first sentence uses a non-essential clause, the second an essential clause. Both are grammatically correct but the emphasis does change slightly. </p>
<p>I possibly prefer your revision but you can&#8217;t state which is wrong or right as I&#8217;m stating an opinion, so the importance of the sub clause to the first part of the sentence is really up to me.</p>
<p>Anyway, it really isn&#8217;t worth worrying about&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;[P]eople are confused about which and that&#8230; This isn’t surprising, as there has been a shift in usage over the past century or so and older guides give different advice from newer ones&#8230; If you wish to write naturally, don’t fuss too much about the usage of that versus which. Obsessive correction (sarcastically called a which hunt) is best avoided&#8217; (<a href="http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm)">http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/which.htm)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Jacobi</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/comment-page-1/#comment-50266</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Jacobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/#comment-50266</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is a really great site, which provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free.&quot;
should be:
&quot;This is a really great site that provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is a really great site, which provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free.&#8221;<br />
should be:<br />
&#8220;This is a really great site that provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/comment-page-1/#comment-47013</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/#comment-47013</guid>
		<description>I do find it strange how people get so aggressive when posting comments online - especially about grammar ;)

Jon, &#039;they&#039; has always been used for the 3rd person singular when the sex of the person referred to is unknown - Though it may be used more in these pc times, I&#039;m pretty sure I remember my Latin teacher suggesting it came from that language, so hardly a modern phenomena!

This is a really great site, which provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free. Jon, you should really check your facts before posting confrontational comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find it strange how people get so aggressive when posting comments online &#8211; especially about grammar <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jon, &#8216;they&#8217; has always been used for the 3rd person singular when the sex of the person referred to is unknown &#8211; Though it may be used more in these pc times, I&#8217;m pretty sure I remember my Latin teacher suggesting it came from that language, so hardly a modern phenomena!</p>
<p>This is a really great site, which provides clear explanations of some complex grammar issues for free. Jon, you should really check your facts before posting confrontational comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/comment-page-1/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>Jon, as much as I don&#039;t like it, &quot;they&quot; has become the &quot;pc&quot; nongender identifier over the last few years. Personally &quot;they&quot; rubs me the wrong way. But I&#039;d never be rude enough to post what you did here; rather, perhaps a private email may have been the proper route to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, as much as I don&#8217;t like it, &#8220;they&#8221; has become the &#8220;pc&#8221; nongender identifier over the last few years. Personally &#8220;they&#8221; rubs me the wrong way. But I&#8217;d never be rude enough to post what you did here; rather, perhaps a private email may have been the proper route to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/comment-page-1/#comment-6237</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/malapropisms/#comment-6237</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I mean “he’s used a word that was not what HE intended, given the context.&quot; 

You&#039;ve just made too many mistakes to correct them all in one sitting, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I mean “he’s used a word that was not what HE intended, given the context.&#8221; </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve just made too many mistakes to correct them all in one sitting, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
