<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Keep Some of the Old Verb Forms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocco</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-393984</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/#comment-393984</guid>
		<description>English was my favorite subject in school, i (just kidding Kathy) ..... I love our language.

I have always felt though, that some of our rules are for calrity and precision while others seemed intentionally complex. If a large percentage of people all use the same incorrect form, it is usually a convenience issue. I guess when enough people do it it becomes ok? 

I have to admit, professional teachers, writers and speakers are held to a higher standard than the average Joe. We count on you to keep the rest of us in the know, so thank you for your tireless efforts at learning our beautifully complex language and being masters of it.

PS If I butchered our beautiful language with bad spelling and poor grammer please consider it tolerence therapy. :) I was one of the few lucky students that was taught ITA in the 70&#039;s. I loved it, but being so beautifully simple, it fostered some neglect at mastering the real deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English was my favorite subject in school, i (just kidding Kathy) &#8230;.. I love our language.</p>
<p>I have always felt though, that some of our rules are for calrity and precision while others seemed intentionally complex. If a large percentage of people all use the same incorrect form, it is usually a convenience issue. I guess when enough people do it it becomes ok? </p>
<p>I have to admit, professional teachers, writers and speakers are held to a higher standard than the average Joe. We count on you to keep the rest of us in the know, so thank you for your tireless efforts at learning our beautifully complex language and being masters of it.</p>
<p>PS If I butchered our beautiful language with bad spelling and poor grammer please consider it tolerence therapy. <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I was one of the few lucky students that was taught ITA in the 70&#8242;s. I loved it, but being so beautifully simple, it fostered some neglect at mastering the real deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnWulf</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-391140</link>
		<dc:creator>AnWulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/#comment-391140</guid>
		<description>@Sally ... I think you meant inexorable but I&#039;m not against putting an Anglo-forefast on a Latinate! lol

However, plead and prove show that weak Latinates can become semi-strong verbs as well.

@Vanessa ... While I like pled, etymologically speaking, it should be pleaded. Why? Because it is yet another Latinate from French and, typically, imported verbs or verbs made from imported nouns are weak verbs. However, this was made to fit a strong verb pattern likely do to the sound such as bleed/bled. So, both past tenses are valid and correct. I like pled and will stick to it.

@Eric and David ... Let me consult my medium circa materiam ... Hmmmm, she&#039;s says that treating media as a collective noun has been around since the 1920s and that it and data both can take a singular verb.

The general rule of thumb is that once a loanword is taken into a language then that language can, and usually does, treat it according to its own grammar rules and usage. It may be plural in Latin but it can be used as a collective noun in English. We do the opposite with information. In English it is a singular noun with no plural (we don&#039;t say informations) ... We took it from French ... and there is a plural in French!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sally &#8230; I think you meant inexorable but I&#8217;m not against putting an Anglo-forefast on a Latinate! lol</p>
<p>However, plead and prove show that weak Latinates can become semi-strong verbs as well.</p>
<p>@Vanessa &#8230; While I like pled, etymologically speaking, it should be pleaded. Why? Because it is yet another Latinate from French and, typically, imported verbs or verbs made from imported nouns are weak verbs. However, this was made to fit a strong verb pattern likely do to the sound such as bleed/bled. So, both past tenses are valid and correct. I like pled and will stick to it.</p>
<p>@Eric and David &#8230; Let me consult my medium circa materiam &#8230; Hmmmm, she&#8217;s says that treating media as a collective noun has been around since the 1920s and that it and data both can take a singular verb.</p>
<p>The general rule of thumb is that once a loanword is taken into a language then that language can, and usually does, treat it according to its own grammar rules and usage. It may be plural in Latin but it can be used as a collective noun in English. We do the opposite with information. In English it is a singular noun with no plural (we don&#8217;t say informations) &#8230; We took it from French &#8230; and there is a plural in French!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-390799</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/#comment-390799</guid>
		<description>Sorry, folks (I won&#039;t use &#039;guys&#039;), but Tony Hearn has the right of it.

As a teacher of English, I love my funny old language too, with all its idiosyncracies and its variations, but as a linguist I must point out that regularization is remorseless and unexorable throughout the human speech community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, folks (I won&#8217;t use &#8216;guys&#8217;), but Tony Hearn has the right of it.</p>
<p>As a teacher of English, I love my funny old language too, with all its idiosyncracies and its variations, but as a linguist I must point out that regularization is remorseless and unexorable throughout the human speech community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnWulf</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-390213</link>
		<dc:creator>AnWulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/#comment-390213</guid>
		<description>I like the strong forms but sometimes it&#039;s better to let them change. Who uses help, holp, holpen?

Occasionally we see a verb go the other way. Proven is common as a past participle even tho it started out as weak Latinate ... proved, proved, proved can now be prove, proved, proven.

And how about get, got, gotten? I still use gotten ... Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the strong forms but sometimes it&#8217;s better to let them change. Who uses help, holp, holpen?</p>
<p>Occasionally we see a verb go the other way. Proven is common as a past participle even tho it started out as weak Latinate &#8230; proved, proved, proved can now be prove, proved, proven.</p>
<p>And how about get, got, gotten? I still use gotten &#8230; Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqui B.</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/comment-page-1/#comment-316765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqui B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/lets-keep-some-of-the-old-verb-forms/#comment-316765</guid>
		<description>I agree with some earlier posters here. As long as we can keep the old, strong forms, and they don&#039;t become &quot;incorrect&quot;, I don&#039;t mind if the new, weak forms become &quot;correct&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some earlier posters here. As long as we can keep the old, strong forms, and they don&#8217;t become &#8220;incorrect&#8221;, I don&#8217;t mind if the new, weak forms become &#8220;correct&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 19:26:03 -->
