<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is &#8220;alright&#8221; all right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casey Goranson</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/comment-page-1/#comment-177690</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Goranson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/#comment-177690</guid>
		<description>While the use of &quot;alright&quot; may be frowned upon by some, it has a fine pedigree. Ever heard of the hymn &quot;Love the Lord alway&quot;? That&#039;s the old way of saying &quot;always&quot;. It&#039;s hundreds of years old.
&quot;Always&quot;has undergone the exact same change as &quot;alright&quot;. Look:

&quot;He&#039;s going out every evening, and it&#039;s always with that girl of his.&quot;
Here, &quot;always&quot; means &quot;on every occasion&quot;

&quot;He&#039;s going out every evening, and it&#039;s all ways with that girl of his.&quot;
Here, &quot;all ways&quot; means &quot;in every manner&quot; (as well as other hidden meanings!).

The two meanings have diverged completely. As has been detailed above, &quot;alright&quot; and &quot;all right&quot; are well on their way to a similar semantic bifurcation.
Would you criticize someone for writing &quot;always&quot; instead of &quot;all ways&quot;? If not, then does it not seem a double standard to criticise &quot;alright&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the use of &#8220;alright&#8221; may be frowned upon by some, it has a fine pedigree. Ever heard of the hymn &#8220;Love the Lord alway&#8221;? That&#8217;s the old way of saying &#8220;always&#8221;. It&#8217;s hundreds of years old.<br />
&#8220;Always&#8221;has undergone the exact same change as &#8220;alright&#8221;. Look:</p>
<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s going out every evening, and it&#8217;s always with that girl of his.&#8221;<br />
Here, &#8220;always&#8221; means &#8220;on every occasion&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s going out every evening, and it&#8217;s all ways with that girl of his.&#8221;<br />
Here, &#8220;all ways&#8221; means &#8220;in every manner&#8221; (as well as other hidden meanings!).</p>
<p>The two meanings have diverged completely. As has been detailed above, &#8220;alright&#8221; and &#8220;all right&#8221; are well on their way to a similar semantic bifurcation.<br />
Would you criticize someone for writing &#8220;always&#8221; instead of &#8220;all ways&#8221;? If not, then does it not seem a double standard to criticise &#8220;alright&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learner</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/comment-page-1/#comment-174364</link>
		<dc:creator>Learner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/#comment-174364</guid>
		<description>its just so good to learn new things!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its just so good to learn new things!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: learner</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/comment-page-1/#comment-174363</link>
		<dc:creator>learner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/#comment-174363</guid>
		<description>since that many people are using &quot;alright&quot; rather than &quot;all right&quot; maybe someday they accept &quot; alright&quot; in the formal English grammar.
 
on the second thought I thought &quot;all right is alright&quot; but thanks to the one who post it.I finally understand the mystery of that words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since that many people are using &#8220;alright&#8221; rather than &#8220;all right&#8221; maybe someday they accept &#8221; alright&#8221; in the formal English grammar.</p>
<p>on the second thought I thought &#8220;all right is alright&#8221; but thanks to the one who post it.I finally understand the mystery of that words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MT</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/comment-page-1/#comment-67985</link>
		<dc:creator>MT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/#comment-67985</guid>
		<description>On the alright vs. all right...if &#039;alright&#039; is not accepted in formal documents, such as in my field of medical typing, and &#039;all right&#039; is the preferred/used term...then what makes that any different from already vs. all ready?  Already - meaning previous/soon  and all ready - meaning entirely ready?  Wouldn&#039;t that make alright - meaning okay or in agreement and all right - meaning correct?

Oh the joy of the English language...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the alright vs. all right&#8230;if &#8216;alright&#8217; is not accepted in formal documents, such as in my field of medical typing, and &#8216;all right&#8217; is the preferred/used term&#8230;then what makes that any different from already vs. all ready?  Already &#8211; meaning previous/soon  and all ready &#8211; meaning entirely ready?  Wouldn&#8217;t that make alright &#8211; meaning okay or in agreement and all right &#8211; meaning correct?</p>
<p>Oh the joy of the English language&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English minor</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/comment-page-1/#comment-35286</link>
		<dc:creator>English minor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/is-alright-all-right/#comment-35286</guid>
		<description>Ms. Roro,

I believe you meant, What is the difference instead of what is the different between picture, image and photo? 

Because this site is to assist one another, or so I was led to believe, I am responding. Also, a picutre and/or photo are actually images reflected by an artist or a camera. 

Hope this help you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Roro,</p>
<p>I believe you meant, What is the difference instead of what is the different between picture, image and photo? </p>
<p>Because this site is to assist one another, or so I was led to believe, I am responding. Also, a picutre and/or photo are actually images reflected by an artist or a camera. </p>
<p>Hope this help you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
