<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inquire vs Enquire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: venqax</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/comment-page-1/#comment-395852</link>
		<dc:creator>venqax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=455#comment-395852</guid>
		<description>Mistermaumau:&lt;i&gt;Sadly, the world is inundated (no, that doesn’t mean something is dated) with people who have no need or desire to differentiate (bet that will change into differenciate) between two completely different words such as enquiry and inquiry.&lt;/i&gt; 

Problem is, they aren’t really 2 different words. Before you blame the omnipotent Americans, check your own authorities: E.g. Quinion at World Wide Words:

 &lt;i&gt;However, in RECENT times British people have developed a difference of meaning between the two forms. Enquire tends to be used for general senses of “ask”…, while inquire implies a formal investigation (as in the legal forum called a public inquiry). But this ISN’T ABSOLUTE by any means, and British English is being influenced by American English, in which inquire and inquiry HAVE LONG BEEN the standard forms&lt;/i&gt; 

Emphasis mine. The point being, there is no historical argument for the “corruption” of meaning of the words, or the precedent of the I vs. the E spellings. You don’t just get to make things up, and the fact that a usage is British doesn’t lend it any automatic venerability, propriety, or even age. It is the British, e.g. who have mushed and “reduced” the distinction between got and gotten. It is the British who’ve invented an atrocity like “jewellery”, in place of the much older and perfectly adequate “jewelry”—thankfully maintained in America. This without even raising the issue of average Britishers of the working type, as opposed to Oxbridge products, whose dialects, argots and pidgins are a hell’s-parade far more varied and frightening than anything that exists on the west side of the Atlantic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mistermaumau:<i>Sadly, the world is inundated (no, that doesn’t mean something is dated) with people who have no need or desire to differentiate (bet that will change into differenciate) between two completely different words such as enquiry and inquiry.</i> </p>
<p>Problem is, they aren’t really 2 different words. Before you blame the omnipotent Americans, check your own authorities: E.g. Quinion at World Wide Words:</p>
<p> <i>However, in RECENT times British people have developed a difference of meaning between the two forms. Enquire tends to be used for general senses of “ask”…, while inquire implies a formal investigation (as in the legal forum called a public inquiry). But this ISN’T ABSOLUTE by any means, and British English is being influenced by American English, in which inquire and inquiry HAVE LONG BEEN the standard forms</i> </p>
<p>Emphasis mine. The point being, there is no historical argument for the “corruption” of meaning of the words, or the precedent of the I vs. the E spellings. You don’t just get to make things up, and the fact that a usage is British doesn’t lend it any automatic venerability, propriety, or even age. It is the British, e.g. who have mushed and “reduced” the distinction between got and gotten. It is the British who’ve invented an atrocity like “jewellery”, in place of the much older and perfectly adequate “jewelry”—thankfully maintained in America. This without even raising the issue of average Britishers of the working type, as opposed to Oxbridge products, whose dialects, argots and pidgins are a hell’s-parade far more varied and frightening than anything that exists on the west side of the Atlantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistermaumau</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/comment-page-1/#comment-395674</link>
		<dc:creator>mistermaumau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=455#comment-395674</guid>
		<description>Pedant, exactly. Sadly, the world is inundated (no, that doesn&#039;t mean something is dated) with people who have no need or desire to differentiate (bet that will change into differenciate) between two completely different words such as enquiry and inquiry. This to the delight of politicians, lawmakers and lawyers, biased media reporters and contract writers who can then play on the &quot;misunderstandings&quot; this leads to in the real world.

Given the chance, most people, specifically Americans, would prefer to reduce language to a manageable batch of 200 words describing everything of importance to their life, with the F-word being ideally suited for replacing over 30% of all words GB/US words without even leading to serious discussions over spelling.

It seems old George got it slightly wrong and underestimated the Proles for it is from below that Newspeak is borning (there, my contribution to their language).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedant, exactly. Sadly, the world is inundated (no, that doesn&#8217;t mean something is dated) with people who have no need or desire to differentiate (bet that will change into differenciate) between two completely different words such as enquiry and inquiry. This to the delight of politicians, lawmakers and lawyers, biased media reporters and contract writers who can then play on the &#8220;misunderstandings&#8221; this leads to in the real world.</p>
<p>Given the chance, most people, specifically Americans, would prefer to reduce language to a manageable batch of 200 words describing everything of importance to their life, with the F-word being ideally suited for replacing over 30% of all words GB/US words without even leading to serious discussions over spelling.</p>
<p>It seems old George got it slightly wrong and underestimated the Proles for it is from below that Newspeak is borning (there, my contribution to their language).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venqax</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/comment-page-1/#comment-395652</link>
		<dc:creator>venqax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=455#comment-395652</guid>
		<description>jbee650: But the words&#039; history really isn&#039;t relevant here. Long-established and current usage are. In American English, it is LONG ESTABLISHED, not just a recent fad, that inquiry/enquiry are not distinct. The usual spelling is I, the E spelling is a variant. In British English, OTOH, the 2 have developed and maintain distinct meanings. Probably mainly due to the British use of inquiry as a term for a law enforcement process. What in American law is called an *investigation*. The 2 languages have been evolving differently for a long time now, as have other national standard-Englishes in other countries. 

Michael: Same as above. The U-less spellings and the American context of I vs E nquiry are not new. Different spellings and usages have evolved in the US, just as they did in the UK and in other places.
People are only using inquiry in or out of context depending on what the context IS. As for spelling, there are rules. Most people just don&#039;t know them. An argument could be made for nite. But gorgus doesn&#039;t work because Gs before Us (and Os) are hard. Like in GUN. That&#039;s why the E is stuck in there to begin with. Now *gorjus* mite make sense. ;). But we are talking about CHANGING the rules. Not just getting them wrong. 
We’re annoyed by basic spelling errors and words used out of context but it’s okay to say “hey, enough people are using the word ‘inquiry’ out of context now that it now means the same thing as enquiry.” Cool. I guess that explains how “American English” (as opposed to “English English”) has dropped the ‘u’ in colour, favour, armour etc. How long until “nite” and “gorgus” are acceptable spellings of the words “night” and “gorgeous” ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jbee650: But the words&#8217; history really isn&#8217;t relevant here. Long-established and current usage are. In American English, it is LONG ESTABLISHED, not just a recent fad, that inquiry/enquiry are not distinct. The usual spelling is I, the E spelling is a variant. In British English, OTOH, the 2 have developed and maintain distinct meanings. Probably mainly due to the British use of inquiry as a term for a law enforcement process. What in American law is called an *investigation*. The 2 languages have been evolving differently for a long time now, as have other national standard-Englishes in other countries. </p>
<p>Michael: Same as above. The U-less spellings and the American context of I vs E nquiry are not new. Different spellings and usages have evolved in the US, just as they did in the UK and in other places.<br />
People are only using inquiry in or out of context depending on what the context IS. As for spelling, there are rules. Most people just don&#8217;t know them. An argument could be made for nite. But gorgus doesn&#8217;t work because Gs before Us (and Os) are hard. Like in GUN. That&#8217;s why the E is stuck in there to begin with. Now *gorjus* mite make sense. <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . But we are talking about CHANGING the rules. Not just getting them wrong.<br />
We’re annoyed by basic spelling errors and words used out of context but it’s okay to say “hey, enough people are using the word ‘inquiry’ out of context now that it now means the same thing as enquiry.” Cool. I guess that explains how “American English” (as opposed to “English English”) has dropped the ‘u’ in colour, favour, armour etc. How long until “nite” and “gorgus” are acceptable spellings of the words “night” and “gorgeous” ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/comment-page-1/#comment-395514</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=455#comment-395514</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re annoyed by basic spelling errors and words used out of context but it&#039;s okay to say &quot;hey, enough people are using the word &#039;inquiry&#039; out of context now that it now means the same thing as enquiry.&quot; Cool. I guess that explains how &quot;American English&quot; (as opposed to &quot;English English&quot;) has dropped the &#039;u&#039; in colour, favour, armour etc. How long until &quot;nite&quot; and &quot;gorgus&quot; are acceptable spellings of the words &quot;night&quot; and &quot;gorgeous&quot; ? Hey, maybe its time to include numerical characters in spelling now too. Let me know, I&#039;d like to name my son N8. N8 for 2056! L8r dudes....

P.S Doesn&#039;t it sh*t you when people say L8ter, adding the &#039;te&#039;? Thats poor numerical english there, that is. That&#039;ll probably be acceptable a few years after l8r is acceptable though, hang in there, Bogans. The world will be yours soon enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re annoyed by basic spelling errors and words used out of context but it&#8217;s okay to say &#8220;hey, enough people are using the word &#8216;inquiry&#8217; out of context now that it now means the same thing as enquiry.&#8221; Cool. I guess that explains how &#8220;American English&#8221; (as opposed to &#8220;English English&#8221;) has dropped the &#8216;u&#8217; in colour, favour, armour etc. How long until &#8220;nite&#8221; and &#8220;gorgus&#8221; are acceptable spellings of the words &#8220;night&#8221; and &#8220;gorgeous&#8221; ? Hey, maybe its time to include numerical characters in spelling now too. Let me know, I&#8217;d like to name my son N8. N8 for 2056! L8r dudes&#8230;.</p>
<p>P.S Doesn&#8217;t it sh*t you when people say L8ter, adding the &#8216;te&#8217;? Thats poor numerical english there, that is. That&#8217;ll probably be acceptable a few years after l8r is acceptable though, hang in there, Bogans. The world will be yours soon enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/inquire-vs-enquire/comment-page-1/#comment-395292</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=455#comment-395292</guid>
		<description>Hashi: you are pretentious and write in a bombastic manner that does nothing to enhance the way your comments read. Why do it? It is not impressive or poetic. I dread to think what job you have because if I had to do business with you I would tell you to cut the crap or get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hashi: you are pretentious and write in a bombastic manner that does nothing to enhance the way your comments read. Why do it? It is not impressive or poetic. I dread to think what job you have because if I had to do business with you I would tell you to cut the crap or get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 02:46:23 -->
