<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hint to Writers: Use the Thesaurus with Caution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-215697</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3924#comment-215697</guid>
		<description>Because Stephen King&#039;s &quot;On Writing,&quot; cited in this pleasant article, is praised widely and warmly, there may be room for a dissenting voice. King has asserted that writers have no use for a thesaurus; that a thesaurus should be tossed into the wastebasket -- literally. He adds that any word found in a thesaurus will be the wrong word, and he insists, after that pronouncement, that &quot;there are no exceptions to that rule. None.&quot;

Much of &quot;On Writing&quot; is a touching memoir that has given hope and encouragement to young and inexperienced writers, and King&#039;s rules of writing seem to me to play to that young and inexperienced audience, as well as to the older writer who has been discouraged by rejections.

&quot;On Writing,&quot; offered by an uncommonly successful and popular writer, has advice that is both helpful and original. But as Lord Macaulay wrote in another context, what is helpful is not original, and what is original is not helpful. After enjoying &quot;On Writing&quot; for its emotional boost, I would move on to the more serious and detailed manuals that are available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Stephen King&#8217;s &#8220;On Writing,&#8221; cited in this pleasant article, is praised widely and warmly, there may be room for a dissenting voice. King has asserted that writers have no use for a thesaurus; that a thesaurus should be tossed into the wastebasket &#8212; literally. He adds that any word found in a thesaurus will be the wrong word, and he insists, after that pronouncement, that &#8220;there are no exceptions to that rule. None.&#8221;</p>
<p>Much of &#8220;On Writing&#8221; is a touching memoir that has given hope and encouragement to young and inexperienced writers, and King&#8217;s rules of writing seem to me to play to that young and inexperienced audience, as well as to the older writer who has been discouraged by rejections.</p>
<p>&#8220;On Writing,&#8221; offered by an uncommonly successful and popular writer, has advice that is both helpful and original. But as Lord Macaulay wrote in another context, what is helpful is not original, and what is original is not helpful. After enjoying &#8220;On Writing&#8221; for its emotional boost, I would move on to the more serious and detailed manuals that are available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-215262</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3924#comment-215262</guid>
		<description>Sorry to be such a pest, but it seems that the incomplete URL does work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be such a pest, but it seems that the incomplete URL does work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-215261</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3924#comment-215261</guid>
		<description>N.B. The URL in my note at #13 was truncated. I hope that this re-post will show up correctly. The URL does not have ellipses. The missing section, after /od/ is advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm 

http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N.B. The URL in my note at #13 was truncated. I hope that this re-post will show up correctly. The URL does not have ellipses. The missing section, after /od/ is advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm </p>
<p><a href="http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm" rel="nofollow">http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-215260</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3924#comment-215260</guid>
		<description>On the odd chance that someone here has not seen &quot;To a Thesaurus,&quot; by Franklin P. Adams (&quot;FPA&quot;), I offer it as it appears at http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm 

&quot;To a Thesaurus&quot;
by Franklin P. Adams

&quot;O precious codex, volume, tome,
Book, writing, compilation, work 
Attend the while I pen a pome,
A jest, a jape, a quip, a quirk.

&quot;For I would pen, engross, indite,
Transcribe, set forth, compose, address,
Record, submit--yea, even write
An ode, an elegy to bless--

&quot;To bless, set store by, celebrate,
Approve, esteem, endow with soul,
Commend, acclaim, appreciate,
Immortalize, laud, praise, extol.

&quot;Thy merit, goodness, value, worth,
Expedience, utility--
O manna, honey, salt of earth,
I sing, I chant, I worship thee!

&quot;How could I manage, live, exist,
Obtain, produce, be real, prevail,
Be present in the flesh, subsist,
Have place, become, breathe or inhale,

&quot;Without thy help, recruit, support,
Opitulation, furtherance,
Assistance, rescue, aid, resort,
Favor, sustention, and advance?

&quot;Alas! Alack! and well-a-day!
My case would then be dour and sad,
Likewise distressing, dismal, gray,
Pathetic, mournful, dreary, bad.

* * *

&quot;Though I could keep this up all day,
This lyric, elegiac, song,
Meseems hath come the time to say
Farewell! Adieu! Good-by! So long!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the odd chance that someone here has not seen &#8220;To a Thesaurus,&#8221; by Franklin P. Adams (&#8220;FPA&#8221;), I offer it as it appears at <a href="http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm" rel="nofollow">http://grammar.about.com/od/advicefromthepros/a/fpathesaurus.htm</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;To a Thesaurus&#8221;<br />
by Franklin P. Adams</p>
<p>&#8220;O precious codex, volume, tome,<br />
Book, writing, compilation, work<br />
Attend the while I pen a pome,<br />
A jest, a jape, a quip, a quirk.</p>
<p>&#8220;For I would pen, engross, indite,<br />
Transcribe, set forth, compose, address,<br />
Record, submit&#8211;yea, even write<br />
An ode, an elegy to bless&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;To bless, set store by, celebrate,<br />
Approve, esteem, endow with soul,<br />
Commend, acclaim, appreciate,<br />
Immortalize, laud, praise, extol.</p>
<p>&#8220;Thy merit, goodness, value, worth,<br />
Expedience, utility&#8211;<br />
O manna, honey, salt of earth,<br />
I sing, I chant, I worship thee!</p>
<p>&#8220;How could I manage, live, exist,<br />
Obtain, produce, be real, prevail,<br />
Be present in the flesh, subsist,<br />
Have place, become, breathe or inhale,</p>
<p>&#8220;Without thy help, recruit, support,<br />
Opitulation, furtherance,<br />
Assistance, rescue, aid, resort,<br />
Favor, sustention, and advance?</p>
<p>&#8220;Alas! Alack! and well-a-day!<br />
My case would then be dour and sad,<br />
Likewise distressing, dismal, gray,<br />
Pathetic, mournful, dreary, bad.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>&#8220;Though I could keep this up all day,<br />
This lyric, elegiac, song,<br />
Meseems hath come the time to say<br />
Farewell! Adieu! Good-by! So long!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/hint-to-writers-use-the-thesaurus-with-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-214501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3924#comment-214501</guid>
		<description>I see the key in Phil&#039;s paraphrasing of Einstein: &lt;em&gt;&quot;One should strive to use as simple a word as possible—but not simpler. &quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Words need to fit; context and appropriateness; scale and scope; baggage and history.

There is no one size fits all - different writing tasks call for different styles and approaches.

There is the directness of Ernest Hemingway.

Then - as an alternative approach - there is the ever-rolling, half page sprawling edifices of sesquipedalian locquacious splendour, replete with clause upon ornamented sub-clause, flowered and bedecked with all the beautiful phrases and faceted byzantine conjunctions of Mervyn Peake&#039;s towering works of fantastic allegorical fiction.

All in all, though, I agree with the central lessons - with the addition that &lt;em&gt;&quot;Whatever words you know right now, you use&quot;&lt;/em&gt; needs to take into account that &#039;right now&#039; is a moving target.  If your vocabulary grows organically through reading broadly, it has a strong foundation - and does not grow in isolation.

If your vocabulary grows through reading a thesaurus, the foundation is shaky, and you&#039;ll be found out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the key in Phil&#8217;s paraphrasing of Einstein: <em>&#8220;One should strive to use as simple a word as possible—but not simpler. &#8220;</em></p>
<p>Words need to fit; context and appropriateness; scale and scope; baggage and history.</p>
<p>There is no one size fits all &#8211; different writing tasks call for different styles and approaches.</p>
<p>There is the directness of Ernest Hemingway.</p>
<p>Then &#8211; as an alternative approach &#8211; there is the ever-rolling, half page sprawling edifices of sesquipedalian locquacious splendour, replete with clause upon ornamented sub-clause, flowered and bedecked with all the beautiful phrases and faceted byzantine conjunctions of Mervyn Peake&#8217;s towering works of fantastic allegorical fiction.</p>
<p>All in all, though, I agree with the central lessons &#8211; with the addition that <em>&#8220;Whatever words you know right now, you use&#8221;</em> needs to take into account that &#8216;right now&#8217; is a moving target.  If your vocabulary grows organically through reading broadly, it has a strong foundation &#8211; and does not grow in isolation.</p>
<p>If your vocabulary grows through reading a thesaurus, the foundation is shaky, and you&#8217;ll be found out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 20:15:15 -->
