Is it different?

[QuillingQuillQuiller]

It's been totally destroyed.

Totally, it's been destroyed.

It looks similar but different. Do you agree?

[Maeve]

The second version is "Valley" English. I don't recommend it.

[Traxius]

It would be better to leave off 'totally.' There's no difference between destroyed and totally destroyed.

It's been destroyed.

Check out this article: http://www.copyblogger.com/lean-copy/

[Rio]

Totally, it was destroyed. Sounds weird. Would anyone talk or write this way? I guess the meaning is similar, however.

I agree with Traxius. So many of us fall in to the trap of using a word like "totally" when it really isn't needed. Destroyed does it.

[QuillingQuillQuiller]

Thanks for the informative answers and hints, everyone.
_________

On the contrary and contrarily.

I found a problem with the contrarily usage, it trapped the meaning of my statements almost every time.

On the contrary:
He knows. On the contrary, she doesn't (know).

Contrarily: (Which one is the right one?)
He knows but she contrarily doesn't know.
He knows but she contrarily knows.
________

May we write:
... but contrarily she ... ?

If we may, then which one is the right one?
He knows but contrarily she doesn't know.
He knows but contrarily she knows.

_________
All refers for "he knows, she doesn't know."

Thanks before.