<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empathic or Empathetic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-395326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3025#comment-395326</guid>
		<description>As an elder advocate, &quot;empathic&quot; implies a good listener who inherently communicates from an internal place of understanding, without adding any of our own stuff. &quot;Empathic&quot; makes room for the other party to express themselves or concerns. It may be a situation where the conversation turns to problems, but the &quot;empathic&quot; person is also willing and able to offer the other party a sounding board for fond memories, recalled accomplishments and sharing simple joys of life. 
&quot;Empathetic&quot; implies a more superficial attitude of &quot;dear, dear, you poor thing&quot; but not understanding. 
I&#039;m going with &quot;empathic.&quot; Thanks for the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an elder advocate, &#8220;empathic&#8221; implies a good listener who inherently communicates from an internal place of understanding, without adding any of our own stuff. &#8220;Empathic&#8221; makes room for the other party to express themselves or concerns. It may be a situation where the conversation turns to problems, but the &#8220;empathic&#8221; person is also willing and able to offer the other party a sounding board for fond memories, recalled accomplishments and sharing simple joys of life.<br />
&#8220;Empathetic&#8221; implies a more superficial attitude of &#8220;dear, dear, you poor thing&#8221; but not understanding.<br />
I&#8217;m going with &#8220;empathic.&#8221; Thanks for the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-393804</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3025#comment-393804</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with empathic all the way.  That is how I learned it (and it was taught that empathetic was incorrect).  Found this conversation because I got into a conversation with a friend my age who had never learned empathic.  I, too, was surprised that empathetic was accepted as early as it was.  Sounds so, so wrong to me - kind of like fingernails on a blackboard.  I realized when I started to get to the bottom of this that I had no idea how one would even spell empathetic.  Now I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with empathic all the way.  That is how I learned it (and it was taught that empathetic was incorrect).  Found this conversation because I got into a conversation with a friend my age who had never learned empathic.  I, too, was surprised that empathetic was accepted as early as it was.  Sounds so, so wrong to me &#8211; kind of like fingernails on a blackboard.  I realized when I started to get to the bottom of this that I had no idea how one would even spell empathetic.  Now I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-393563</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3025#comment-393563</guid>
		<description>@ anton: This may be a bit pedantic, but empathy is not the ability to place oneself in another person&#039;s shoes. It is the &#039;as if&#039;&#039; quality...as if you were in there shoes, as you can never truly know how it feels to be in their shoes. This is how Carl Rogers, the creator of Person Centred Therapy describes empathy, one of the three core conditions in the therapy.

@ Rachel I would see close similarities between sympathy and  looking down on a person to a degree, as sympathy isn&#039;t necessarily understanding a person.....it has a quality of listening to the person and then patting them on the head and saying &quot;awww&quot;. Calling them pathetic however, I don&#039;t see as relating to either sympathy or empathy.


I too have been curious about empathetic and empathic as I can&#039;t remember which term we used at Uni and I&#039;m having to right it in my CV at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ anton: This may be a bit pedantic, but empathy is not the ability to place oneself in another person&#8217;s shoes. It is the &#8216;as if&#8221; quality&#8230;as if you were in there shoes, as you can never truly know how it feels to be in their shoes. This is how Carl Rogers, the creator of Person Centred Therapy describes empathy, one of the three core conditions in the therapy.</p>
<p>@ Rachel I would see close similarities between sympathy and  looking down on a person to a degree, as sympathy isn&#8217;t necessarily understanding a person&#8230;..it has a quality of listening to the person and then patting them on the head and saying &#8220;awww&#8221;. Calling them pathetic however, I don&#8217;t see as relating to either sympathy or empathy.</p>
<p>I too have been curious about empathetic and empathic as I can&#8217;t remember which term we used at Uni and I&#8217;m having to right it in my CV at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthon St Maarten</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-392695</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthon St Maarten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3025#comment-392695</guid>
		<description>@Mary, I agree with the distinction you make between &#039;empathic&#039; and &#039;empathetic&#039;. I also use empathetic to describe the empathy an ordinary person would feel, while empathic (or clairempathy) is more appropriate to describe the feeling experienced by an Empath.

The use of the term &#039;empathy&#039; to describe an extra-sensory ability is inaccurate, confusing and misleading.  It is a a term that is increasingly being abused by people who have no real psychic ability. Empathy is a normal human psychological trait, and it is something all people have to some extent (unless you are a psychopath, sadist or pathological narcissist).  

Empathy basically means being able to place yourself in someone else’s shoes. It is the natural tendency we all have to identify with, and be understanding of another person’s feelings, motives and circumstances. Some experts believe we are born with it, while others say we are taught to be considerate towards others by our parents.

The more sensitive or empathetic you are, the more able you will be to comprehend and sense how others are feeling. But this is NOT an extra-sensory ability! You are not an Empath just because you are able to pick up on someone else’s feelings through cues you get from their body language, their facial expressions, their tone of voice, as well as behaviors like crying, or sighing, etc. 

Yet many people go around announcing that they &quot;have empathy&quot;, which makes them somehow special or gifted. By implication this would mean that all people who do not consider themselves Empaths, but instead see themselves merely as normal, caring people, should in fact all be called psychopaths and narcissists.

If you are someone that has strongly developed empathy for others (i.e. you are very &#039;empathetic&#039;) you would naturally be very aware of emotional signs and moods in someone else. But that does not make you an Empath. It just makes you a very well-adjusted, kind and considerate person.

I am an Empath myself, and in my experience an Empath is a person who has vivid &#039;clairempathic&#039; experiences or abilities. This means that the Empath has a direct experience of the other person’s emotions and moods, as if they were his own. Often you don’t even know where these feelings are coming from. 

Empaths who are unaware of their own &#039;empathic&#039; ability are known to go around for years &#039;picking up&#039; unwanted emotional signals wherever they go, without understanding why their positive state of mind has suddenly changed to a really bad mood the moment they went out in public.

Therefore, being &#039;empathetic&#039; is not just about identifying with someone else and feeling bad for them when they are having a tough day. With clairempathy you literally feel the sadness along with the other person, often without communicating directly with them or being in the same room with them. The Empath doesn’t only know or understand how others feel, he actually feels what others feel and also knows what the cause is and what could be done to resolve it. With normal empathy you don’t necessarily know why someone is sad, but you still feel sorry for them. With clairempathy you know where their feelings are coming from without any prior information, and you know how they will feel tomorrow and you also know how their current feelings are linked to their childhood, etc. 

Clairempathy is further also associated with physical sensations or medical symptoms. For example, I would be in line at the supermarket and suddenly feel pain or numbness in my shoulder, and when I turn around there would be someone further down the line of people who has their arm in a sling. Clairempathy or &#039;empathic&#039; ability is considered to be an aspect of clairsentience (clear sensing or feeling).

So, clairempathy or &#039;being empathic&#039; is a developed extra-sensory perception of emotions and feelings. It is a paranormal phenomenon and it goes beyond empathy or &#039;being empathetic&#039; as a natural human trait.  Your distinction between being &#039;empathic&#039; and being &#039;empathetic&#039; is therefore useful and meaningful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mary, I agree with the distinction you make between &#8216;empathic&#8217; and &#8216;empathetic&#8217;. I also use empathetic to describe the empathy an ordinary person would feel, while empathic (or clairempathy) is more appropriate to describe the feeling experienced by an Empath.</p>
<p>The use of the term &#8216;empathy&#8217; to describe an extra-sensory ability is inaccurate, confusing and misleading.  It is a a term that is increasingly being abused by people who have no real psychic ability. Empathy is a normal human psychological trait, and it is something all people have to some extent (unless you are a psychopath, sadist or pathological narcissist).  </p>
<p>Empathy basically means being able to place yourself in someone else’s shoes. It is the natural tendency we all have to identify with, and be understanding of another person’s feelings, motives and circumstances. Some experts believe we are born with it, while others say we are taught to be considerate towards others by our parents.</p>
<p>The more sensitive or empathetic you are, the more able you will be to comprehend and sense how others are feeling. But this is NOT an extra-sensory ability! You are not an Empath just because you are able to pick up on someone else’s feelings through cues you get from their body language, their facial expressions, their tone of voice, as well as behaviors like crying, or sighing, etc. </p>
<p>Yet many people go around announcing that they &#8220;have empathy&#8221;, which makes them somehow special or gifted. By implication this would mean that all people who do not consider themselves Empaths, but instead see themselves merely as normal, caring people, should in fact all be called psychopaths and narcissists.</p>
<p>If you are someone that has strongly developed empathy for others (i.e. you are very &#8216;empathetic&#8217;) you would naturally be very aware of emotional signs and moods in someone else. But that does not make you an Empath. It just makes you a very well-adjusted, kind and considerate person.</p>
<p>I am an Empath myself, and in my experience an Empath is a person who has vivid &#8216;clairempathic&#8217; experiences or abilities. This means that the Empath has a direct experience of the other person’s emotions and moods, as if they were his own. Often you don’t even know where these feelings are coming from. </p>
<p>Empaths who are unaware of their own &#8216;empathic&#8217; ability are known to go around for years &#8216;picking up&#8217; unwanted emotional signals wherever they go, without understanding why their positive state of mind has suddenly changed to a really bad mood the moment they went out in public.</p>
<p>Therefore, being &#8216;empathetic&#8217; is not just about identifying with someone else and feeling bad for them when they are having a tough day. With clairempathy you literally feel the sadness along with the other person, often without communicating directly with them or being in the same room with them. The Empath doesn’t only know or understand how others feel, he actually feels what others feel and also knows what the cause is and what could be done to resolve it. With normal empathy you don’t necessarily know why someone is sad, but you still feel sorry for them. With clairempathy you know where their feelings are coming from without any prior information, and you know how they will feel tomorrow and you also know how their current feelings are linked to their childhood, etc. </p>
<p>Clairempathy is further also associated with physical sensations or medical symptoms. For example, I would be in line at the supermarket and suddenly feel pain or numbness in my shoulder, and when I turn around there would be someone further down the line of people who has their arm in a sling. Clairempathy or &#8216;empathic&#8217; ability is considered to be an aspect of clairsentience (clear sensing or feeling).</p>
<p>So, clairempathy or &#8216;being empathic&#8217; is a developed extra-sensory perception of emotions and feelings. It is a paranormal phenomenon and it goes beyond empathy or &#8216;being empathetic&#8217; as a natural human trait.  Your distinction between being &#8216;empathic&#8217; and being &#8216;empathetic&#8217; is therefore useful and meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/empathic-or-empathetic/comment-page-1/#comment-387599</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 04:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3025#comment-387599</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful conversation!  So good to see that there are indeed people who are interested in words beyond the current barrage of texting abbreviations.  (I had a college student actually say &quot;BTW&quot; to me the other day.)
Given the sacred christening of OED and Webster, I should say that it is nice to be able to choose for ourselves and debate the merits of each here.  My undergrad is in English and graduate degrees are in Counseling and therefore I have grown curious, since I use the word very often and read it both ways as well.
I prefer &quot;empathic&quot; and haven&#039;t yet had to explain myself, though I am &quot;sympathic&quot; towards those who may be confused by it.  : )  I don&#039;t think Star Trek or telepathic research has made much of a dent in the expectations of the general public on the derivatives of the word empathy.  A few of us know it, but I haven&#039;t found that Star Trek affects my word choice or connotations.
Of course, the truth is that we make up the rules and try to follow them, but, in the end, we make our own choices depending on common usage, preference, or influential exemplars.
Happy choosing my friends!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful conversation!  So good to see that there are indeed people who are interested in words beyond the current barrage of texting abbreviations.  (I had a college student actually say &#8220;BTW&#8221; to me the other day.)<br />
Given the sacred christening of OED and Webster, I should say that it is nice to be able to choose for ourselves and debate the merits of each here.  My undergrad is in English and graduate degrees are in Counseling and therefore I have grown curious, since I use the word very often and read it both ways as well.<br />
I prefer &#8220;empathic&#8221; and haven&#8217;t yet had to explain myself, though I am &#8220;sympathic&#8221; towards those who may be confused by it.  : )  I don&#8217;t think Star Trek or telepathic research has made much of a dent in the expectations of the general public on the derivatives of the word empathy.  A few of us know it, but I haven&#8217;t found that Star Trek affects my word choice or connotations.<br />
Of course, the truth is that we make up the rules and try to follow them, but, in the end, we make our own choices depending on common usage, preference, or influential exemplars.<br />
Happy choosing my friends!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 09:09:19 -->
