<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conversational Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:41:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anbu</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/comment-page-1/#comment-391499</link>
		<dc:creator>Anbu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=524#comment-391499</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Please review the below two statements that I using in my formal email communication and advice me which statement is good way of writing (&quot;so&quot; or &quot;therefore&quot;).

statement#1:

We need to confirm the testing time to users for the below activity, so we request to confirm the timing at the earliest today.

statement#2:

We need to confirm the testing time to users for the below activity, therefore we request to confirm the timing at the earliest today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Please review the below two statements that I using in my formal email communication and advice me which statement is good way of writing (&#8220;so&#8221; or &#8220;therefore&#8221;).</p>
<p>statement#1:</p>
<p>We need to confirm the testing time to users for the below activity, so we request to confirm the timing at the earliest today.</p>
<p>statement#2:</p>
<p>We need to confirm the testing time to users for the below activity, therefore we request to confirm the timing at the earliest today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ava Lucanus</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/comment-page-1/#comment-280136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ava Lucanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 03:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=524#comment-280136</guid>
		<description>This is such an interesting subject because email is so new to society. Because email is written language and more challenging to generate the intended tone than a telephone call, I find softer indirect language works better. e.g. &quot;You mentioned...&quot; rather than &quot;you said...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting subject because email is so new to society. Because email is written language and more challenging to generate the intended tone than a telephone call, I find softer indirect language works better. e.g. &#8220;You mentioned&#8230;&#8221; rather than &#8220;you said&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amr</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/comment-page-1/#comment-273871</link>
		<dc:creator>amr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=524#comment-273871</guid>
		<description>i need to write concise and tactfully</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need to write concise and tactfully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shanika Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/comment-page-1/#comment-53869</link>
		<dc:creator>Shanika Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=524#comment-53869</guid>
		<description>I have always written my emails as conversational. They are less likely to get thrown in the trash folder and deleted.

I actually did a test between the two. My conversational emails were opened more frequently than a sale email, which alot of the top internet marketers love to do.

Your shield is just not up with a friendlier email.  As people see more and more frequently that you are talking to them as a &quot;person&quot;, not a &quot;prospect&quot;, you have gained their attention. And in the future, a response and a sale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always written my emails as conversational. They are less likely to get thrown in the trash folder and deleted.</p>
<p>I actually did a test between the two. My conversational emails were opened more frequently than a sale email, which alot of the top internet marketers love to do.</p>
<p>Your shield is just not up with a friendlier email.  As people see more and more frequently that you are talking to them as a &#8220;person&#8221;, not a &#8220;prospect&#8221;, you have gained their attention. And in the future, a response and a sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/conversational-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27924</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=524#comment-27924</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know any other way to reach you to let you know that I have been unable to open your latest email. Something seems to be wrong with just the email since I am able to reach your web site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know any other way to reach you to let you know that I have been unable to open your latest email. Something seems to be wrong with just the email since I am able to reach your web site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 03:26:46 -->
