<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daily Writing Tips &#187; Spelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/category/spelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Negative Prefix il-</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-negative-prefix-il/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-negative-prefix-il/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maeve Maddox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reader writes: I used to hear from my history teacher in high school that the word "illegal" isn't actually a word. I never followed up on that notion, but I suppose from popular usage, "illegal" has become legitimized. Do you have any etymological info on that?<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a reader commenting on the<a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/illegal-aliens-and-illegal-immigrants/"> illegal alien post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I used to hear from my history teacher in high school that the word &#8220;illegal&#8221; isn&#8217;t actually a word. I never followed up on that notion, but I suppose from popular usage, &#8220;illegal&#8221; has become legitimized. Do you have any etymological info on that?</p></blockquote>
<p>The word <strong>illegal</strong> with the sense of “not legal or lawful” has been in English since 1626. Similar words existed in Middle English and French as early as the fourteenth century.</p>
<p>The expression <em>illegal immigrant</em> dates from 1939 during the British mandate in Palestine. The term was applied to Jews who entered Palestine without authorization.</p>
<p>The word <strong>illegal</strong> derives ultimately from Latin: <em>legalis</em> “legal” with the negative prefix in-. The <strong>n</strong> of the prefix assimilates to <strong>l</strong> in words that begin with <strong>l</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>illegal</strong>: not legal or lawful</p>
<p><strong>illegible</strong>: not legible; incapable of being read</p>
<p><strong>illegitimate</strong>: not recognized by law as lawful offspring; not rightly deduced; departing from the expected</p>
<p><strong>illiberal</strong>: not liberal; not generous; not broad-minded</p>
<p><strong>illicit</strong>: not permitted; not allowed</p>
<p><strong>illimitable</strong>: not capable of being limited or bounded</p>
<p><strong>illiterate</strong>: unable to read or write</p>
<p><strong>illogical</strong>: not logical; contrary to logic</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/the-negative-prefix-il/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verbs in -ize and -ise</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbs-in-ize-and-ise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbs-in-ize-and-ise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maeve Maddox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should it be "realise" or "realize"?<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>I suppose being a Brit., I should to use -ise instead of -ize? For example, realise/realize. I prefer to use -ize in most cases. Any rules say I can&#8217;t?</p></blockquote>
<p>I am pleased to report that British usage and American usage agree on the spelling of the verb <strong>realize</strong>.</p>
<p>Look up “realise” in the OED and you will be taken to the entry for <strong>realize</strong>.</p>
<p>The spelling “realise” is, however, a recognized alternate spelling of <strong>realize</strong>.</p>
<p>H. W. Fowler makes it clear that most English verbs that end in -ize or -ise and are pronounced [iz] go back to a Greek ending that contains a z.  He points out that although British printers of his time follow the French practice of converting the z to an s in such verbs, the OED and other respected authorities prefer to keep the z.</p>
<p>Both Yanks and Brits are allowed to use the -ize ending in most instances, for example:<br />
baptize<br />
authorize<br />
canonize<br />
recognize<br />
agonize<br />
characterize<br />
stigmatize<br />
methodize<br />
patronize<br />
womanize<br />
popularize<br />
philosophize<br />
civilize </p>
<p>Nevertheless, English being what it is, there remains a small group of verbs that call for the -ise ending on both sides of the Atlantic.  These are verbs that, according to Fowler, </p>
<blockquote><p>do not get their -se even remotely from the Greek -izo, &#038; must be spelt with -s-”  </p></blockquote>
<p>Here are the most common -ise verbs:<br />
advertise<br />
apprise<br />
chastise<br />
circumcise<br />
comprise<br />
compromise<br />
demise<br />
despise<br />
devise<br />
disfranchise<br />
disguise<br />
enfranchise<br />
enterprise<br />
excise<br />
exercise<br />
improvise<br />
incise<br />
premise<br />
supervise<br />
surmise<br />
surprise</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/verbs-in-ize-and-ise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Words Often Misspelled Because of Double Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/words-often-misspelled-because-of-double-letters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/words-often-misspelled-because-of-double-letters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maeve Maddox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An email in which <strong>balloon</strong> was spelled “baloon” got me thinking about words with double letters.<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An email in which <strong>balloon</strong> was spelled “baloon” got me thinking about words with double letters.</p>
<p>Many of the most frequently-misspelled words in English are misspelled by leaving out a letter. </p>
<p>Others are misspelled because we think a letter should be doubled, so we put in an extra one.</p>
<p>I thought it might be useful to organize these frequently-misspelled words into three categories.</p>
<p><strong>Words we try to spell with too few letters</strong><br />
balloon<br />
dumbbell<br />
embarrass<br />
millennium<br />
misspell<br />
occurrence<br />
possession<br />
broccoli<br />
occasionally<br />
questionnaire<br />
coolly<br />
dissipate<br />
difference<br />
generally<br />
incidentally<br />
magically<br />
success</p>
<p><strong>Words that have double letters, but not as many as we think </strong><br />
deterrence<br />
harass<br />
personnel<br />
recommend<br />
referred<br />
disappear<br />
disappoint<br />
finally<br />
fulfill<br />
necessary<br />
occasion<br />
occurred<br />
parallel<br />
sheriff<br />
tomorrow</p>
<p><strong>Words that don’t have double letters, but we want to add them</strong><br />
preferable<br />
procedure<br />
coliseum<br />
labeled </p>
<p>NOTE:<br />
i. There’s also the spelling <strong>colosseum</strong> with a double s.<br />
ii. British usage doubles the l in <strong>labelled</strong>. </p>
<p>Caveat to writers of British English: Most word-processing software comes with spell-checkers programmed for American spelling usage.</p>
<p>Another NOTE: Merriam-Webster gives <strong>programmed</strong> as the first spelling and <strong>programed</strong> as an alternate. Go figure.</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/words-often-misspelled-because-of-double-letters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CamelCase</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/camelcase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/camelcase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maeve Maddox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will cutesy corporate spelling catch on in ordinary use, or will writers flatten the humps of CamelCase?<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader commenting on my <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/ebook-ebook-ebook-or-e-book/">e-mail post</a> brought my attention to a term I’d not heard before:</p>
<blockquote><p>It will end up simply as book, but before that happens it will be ebook—just as email ended up as email. eBook looks entirely too corporate to me, and I doubt if the general writing public will ever adopt camel case for anyThing, ever.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Camel case,</strong> also appropriately spelled <strong>CamelCase</strong>, is the practice of writing a word with a capital inside it. For example:</p>
<blockquote><p>iPhone<br />
CinemaScope<br />
VistaVision<br />
AstroTurf</p></blockquote>
<p>The name comes from the fact that the uppercase letter makes a “hump” in the word.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CamelCase#Variations_and_synonyms">Wiki article</a> gives a long list of other terms for this practice. Here are a few: BumpyCaps, CamelBack, CamelCaps, CapWords, mixedCase, and RollerCoasterCaps.</p>
<p>I have to agree that words written that way are a bit too cutesy to survive as real words.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say there is no practical use for the mingling of upper- and lowercase letters. For example, in chemistry: NaCl, AgF, BaSe, etc.</p>
<p>As for the e-book poll, 326 DWT readers voted. The form <strong>e-book</strong> received 50% of the votes. The CamelCase version <strong>eBook</strong> came in second at 26%.</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/camelcase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strolling Down the [AV]</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/strolling-down-the-av/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/strolling-down-the-av/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maeve Maddox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the word "avenue" may be going the way of "versus."<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I thought I’d developed a thicker skin regarding linguistic innovation! </p>
<p>I was listening to classical music on my local NPR station the other morning when the DJ launched into some public service announcements. </p>
<p>The first time she said [av] for <strong>avenue</strong> I wasn’t sure I’d heard correctly, but then she mentioned another address that included the word <strong>avenue</strong>.  Again she said [av]. And then, leaving no doubt whatever, she pronounced a third address as &#8220;Central [av].&#8221; </p>
<p>Say it isn’t so!  </p>
<p>I need the help of you readers on this one. Googling won’t help me figure out if this is a trend or merely a local aberration. Please let me know if you have heard anyone pronounce the abbreviated form of <strong>Avenue</strong> as anything other than [ăv'ə-nū'] or [ăv'ə-nyū']</p>
<p>For the record, <strong>avenue</strong>, abbreviated <em>Ave</em>. or <em>Av</em>., came into the language as a military term meaning “a way of approach.”  Now it refers to a wide street lined with trees or, in some cases, a street having a planted median.</p>
<p>In British usage an avenue is the roadway leading from the gate to the front of a country house, like the lovely tree-shaded approach to Manderly in the movie <em>Rebecca</em>.</p>
<p>I suppose I shouldn’t be too astonished. The word <strong>versus</strong>, abbreviated <em>vs</em>. or <em>v</em>. is now universally pronounced [vee].</p>
<p><hr>
<strong>Your eBook</strong>: <a href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/download/Basic-English-Grammar.zip">Click here to download the Basic English Grammar ebook.</a> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/strolling-down-the-av/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
