Case of the Missing “i”s: foliage, verbiage, miniature
In the Fall, when television weather persons turn their thoughts to foliage, rhapsodizing about the beautiful orange and red and yellow leaves along the highways and streets, I cringe every time they pronounce the word as if it had only two syllables.
The dictionaries I’ve consulted still list only one pronunciation for foliage: /foh lee ij/.
Three-syllable verbiage /vur bee ij/ and four-syllable miniature /min ee uh cher/, however, are so frequently pronounced without their “i”s that the non-standard mispronunciations are appearing in some dictionaries.
Other than creating spelling problems, the truncated pronunciations of foliage, verbiage, and miniature probably won’t matter in the long run, since they don’t obscure meaning.
One may argue that the word parliament is pronounced with three syllables, but it probably always has been. It came into the language as three-syllable parlement and was spelled that way until about the time Chaucer died in 1400. Then some learned gentlemen changed the spelling from “parlement” to “parliament” to make it conform to M.L. parliamentum.
Verbiage comes from French verbier “to chatter” and miniature, from Italian miniatura, both of which embody “i”s meant to be pronounced.
Conclusion: Although it’s possible to argue for the i-less pronunciations of foliage, verbiage, and miniature as acceptable evolutions of pronunciation, it’s still preferable to preserve the “i”s.
Why?
Because by retaining the “i”s we can avoid creating three more English words that are not spelled the way they are pronounced.
Maeve on October 1, 2007 
Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Related Articles
Bookmark
5 Responses to “Case of the Missing “i”s: foliage, verbiage, miniature”
Got something to say?
Sponsors
Popular Articles
- 6 Foreign Expressions You Should Know
- The Impotence of Proofreading
- Let the Word Do the Work
- 10 Rules for Writing Numbers and Numerals
- 8 Proofreading Tips and Techniques
- 40 Yiddish Words You Should Know
- TV's War on "Me" and "I"
- 34 Writing Tips That Will Make You a Better Writer
- Gross Writing Errors on the Web
- Creative Writing 101
- Latin Words and Expressions
- Usage That Provokes “Blackboard Moments”
- 44 Resume Writing Tips
Recent Articles
- Word of the Day: Bankruptcy
- The KISS Guide To Writing Keyword Rich Articles
- Five Reasons Why Blogging Improves Your Writing
- English Grammar 101: Interjections
- Good Writing “A Matter of Opinion”?
- Short Story Competition: Send Your 500 Words Story In!
- Converse Terms
- Daily Writing Tips Has Crossed the 10,000 Subscribers Mark
- Prevaricate vs Procrastinate
- 13 Ways to Make a Freelance Living
Subscribe via E-Mail
Can’t we change the spelling?
If we change the spelling for these three words how many more will have to be changed due to incorrect pronunciation?
I also wonder if people who speak other languages are experiencing the same linguistic shift?
Dan,
In theory, nothing could be simpler than to change the spelling.
In practice, spelling is more resistant to change than pronunciation. Without the existence of an official Academy of English that could sanction such a change, we’d just be misspelling them.
Mary Ann,
I think all languages have the same kinds of disconnects between the written and spoken forms. They’d have to since pronunciation is always changing.
Personally, I delight in the vagaries of English spelling. I see words as fossils. Their spellings often tell their history and origins.
Still, I acknowledge that all the oddities can be frustating from a purely practical standpoint.