<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Foot Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:00:37 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-290959</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3932#comment-290959</guid>
		<description>Haha, this article is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, this article is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiv</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-286378</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3932#comment-286378</guid>
		<description>The site is a gift from heaven for people like us who feel the constant need to better our language. Having swam a while in the vast ocean of the internet looking for guidance, I can say that it is undoubtedly the &#039;best&#039; of the lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site is a gift from heaven for people like us who feel the constant need to better our language. Having swam a while in the vast ocean of the internet looking for guidance, I can say that it is undoubtedly the &#8216;best&#8217; of the lot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-215407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3932#comment-215407</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with the assertion that &quot;best&quot; implies &quot;out of three or more&quot;.  I&#039;d love to see a reference if you&#039;ve got one.

To my mind, there&#039;s a fundamental distinction between comparatives and superlatives.  As I understand it, &quot;better&quot; and other comparatives are used in relation to a particular option: the left foot is better than the right (for example).  On the other hand (foot?), &quot;best&quot; and other superlatives are used in relation to all the other options -- regardless of how many &quot;all&quot; may mean.  In this case, the left may be both the &quot;better&quot; and the &quot;best&quot; foot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with the assertion that &#8220;best&#8221; implies &#8220;out of three or more&#8221;.  I&#8217;d love to see a reference if you&#8217;ve got one.</p>
<p>To my mind, there&#8217;s a fundamental distinction between comparatives and superlatives.  As I understand it, &#8220;better&#8221; and other comparatives are used in relation to a particular option: the left foot is better than the right (for example).  On the other hand (foot?), &#8220;best&#8221; and other superlatives are used in relation to all the other options &#8212; regardless of how many &#8220;all&#8221; may mean.  In this case, the left may be both the &#8220;better&#8221; and the &#8220;best&#8221; foot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-213708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3932#comment-213708</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that in a wedding party with, for instance, only two groomsmen, the one charged with holding the ring for the groom should be named as the &quot;&lt;em&gt;Better Man&lt;/em&gt;&quot; instead of &quot;&lt;em&gt;Best Man&lt;/em&gt;&quot;?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that in a wedding party with, for instance, only two groomsmen, the one charged with holding the ring for the groom should be named as the &#8220;<em>Better Man</em>&#8221; instead of &#8220;<em>Best Man</em>&#8220;?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Bliss</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/best-foot-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-212909</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Bliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=3932#comment-212909</guid>
		<description>Someone who puts their &quot;best foot forward&quot; must...  If there ever was a real battle over using the plural pronoun this way, it has long since been lost. This usage was common even before &quot;his&quot; became politically incorrect and I will confess to having slipped into it myself from time to time. Linguists dismiss people like me as language purists, but to me (and pretty much only me, I&#039;m afraid) this smacks of laziness and sounds ugly. In casual speech, I can accept it but when committing something to paper, surely a writer can take ten seconds to think of a better phrasing. Putting ones &quot;best foot forward&quot; must... uses fewer word and doesn&#039;t introduce any sort of awkwardness to the sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone who puts their &#8220;best foot forward&#8221; must&#8230;  If there ever was a real battle over using the plural pronoun this way, it has long since been lost. This usage was common even before &#8220;his&#8221; became politically incorrect and I will confess to having slipped into it myself from time to time. Linguists dismiss people like me as language purists, but to me (and pretty much only me, I&#8217;m afraid) this smacks of laziness and sounds ugly. In casual speech, I can accept it but when committing something to paper, surely a writer can take ten seconds to think of a better phrasing. Putting ones &#8220;best foot forward&#8221; must&#8230; uses fewer word and doesn&#8217;t introduce any sort of awkwardness to the sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
