<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Man is Not a Widow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:00:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-9226</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/#comment-9226</guid>
		<description>I think that &quot;Deja Vu all over again&quot; is meant to be a joke, because deja vu is the feeling that something has repeated, and then you&#039;re repeating yourself inside the phrase. ;)

I can&#039;t explain the in-post examples, though. Those are just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that &#8220;Deja Vu all over again&#8221; is meant to be a joke, because deja vu is the feeling that something has repeated, and then you&#8217;re repeating yourself inside the phrase. <img src='http://www.dailywritingtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t explain the in-post examples, though. Those are just silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-9193</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/#comment-9193</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing this out. I hear widow used incorrectly occasionally, but I always have to stop myself from correcting the speaker. 

Could you do a comment on using &quot;orphan?&quot; Recently an adult acquaintance said that she was an orphan now that her father had died. I sympathized with her but since she is in her fifties. I found the use odd. It is correct in that her parents are both gone, but still I think the word is more for children.

Thanks and I really like the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing this out. I hear widow used incorrectly occasionally, but I always have to stop myself from correcting the speaker. </p>
<p>Could you do a comment on using &#8220;orphan?&#8221; Recently an adult acquaintance said that she was an orphan now that her father had died. I sympathized with her but since she is in her fifties. I found the use odd. It is correct in that her parents are both gone, but still I think the word is more for children.</p>
<p>Thanks and I really like the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Salter</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-9191</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Salter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/#comment-9191</guid>
		<description>“deja vu all over again”

I may be mistaken but I think that refers to a Yogi Berra statement. Berra was renowned for mangling the language but was beloved for his malapropisms-- if that&#039;s the correct term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“deja vu all over again”</p>
<p>I may be mistaken but I think that refers to a Yogi Berra statement. Berra was renowned for mangling the language but was beloved for his malapropisms&#8211; if that&#8217;s the correct term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-9189</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/#comment-9189</guid>
		<description>First Annual Fill-in-the-Blank (Conference, Seminar, Banquet, etc.)

I say it&#039;s not annual until you&#039;ve done it a second time. And I dislike numbering events anyway. Just a personal thing I suppose. Who care if it is the 39th Annual Berry Picking Party. Just call it the Berry Picking Party and get on with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Annual Fill-in-the-Blank (Conference, Seminar, Banquet, etc.)</p>
<p>I say it&#8217;s not annual until you&#8217;ve done it a second time. And I dislike numbering events anyway. Just a personal thing I suppose. Who care if it is the 39th Annual Berry Picking Party. Just call it the Berry Picking Party and get on with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-9181</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-man-is-not-a-widow/#comment-9181</guid>
		<description>The other week, I heard a speaker address a large audience and announce that there were at least two &quot;centurions&quot; in attendance. Turning around and expecting to see two Roman commanders, I realized that the speaker was celebrating the attendance of two &quot;centenarians&quot; who were not and had never been officers in the Roman army. They would have needed to be much much older than  one hundred years old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other week, I heard a speaker address a large audience and announce that there were at least two &#8220;centurions&#8221; in attendance. Turning around and expecting to see two Roman commanders, I realized that the speaker was celebrating the attendance of two &#8220;centenarians&#8221; who were not and had never been officers in the Roman army. They would have needed to be much much older than  one hundred years old!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
