<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;A Historic&#8221; or &#8220;An Historic&#8221; Event?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: KME</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/comment-page-1/#comment-393640</link>
		<dc:creator>KME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1143#comment-393640</guid>
		<description>If &quot;an historic&quot; is a grammatical error, it&#039;s the odd error that actually makes its user sound better educated. I think the original post had the right idea: it&#039;s an idiom and we shouldn&#039;t be too concerned with its nonconformity. Perhaps the reason &quot;an historic event&quot; persists is because it seems a particularly fitting nod to the meaning of history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If &#8220;an historic&#8221; is a grammatical error, it&#8217;s the odd error that actually makes its user sound better educated. I think the original post had the right idea: it&#8217;s an idiom and we shouldn&#8217;t be too concerned with its nonconformity. Perhaps the reason &#8220;an historic event&#8221; persists is because it seems a particularly fitting nod to the meaning of history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ceej</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/comment-page-1/#comment-393545</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ceej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 03:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1143#comment-393545</guid>
		<description>When I hear newscasters use the phrase, &quot;an historic,&quot; I say to them through the television, as if they could hear me, &quot;You must have an grammar problem.  You must have never graduated from an school.  How did you get an show on television?&quot;

Well, do I have an point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hear newscasters use the phrase, &#8220;an historic,&#8221; I say to them through the television, as if they could hear me, &#8220;You must have an grammar problem.  You must have never graduated from an school.  How did you get an show on television?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, do I have an point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/comment-page-1/#comment-391042</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1143#comment-391042</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why people have just, out of the blue, started saying, &quot;An Istoric...” since there is no such word as “istoric”. It’s not like the word ‘honest’, which begins with an O sound. History, Hispanic and Historic all begin with hard Hs. They always have. Where this started, I don’t know. It seems as if bad grammar has become correct grammar. Imagine if someone pronounced ‘hand’ as ‘and’, and said “an hand.” That’s how bad it sounds when someone says, “An istorical...”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why people have just, out of the blue, started saying, &#8220;An Istoric&#8230;” since there is no such word as “istoric”. It’s not like the word ‘honest’, which begins with an O sound. History, Hispanic and Historic all begin with hard Hs. They always have. Where this started, I don’t know. It seems as if bad grammar has become correct grammar. Imagine if someone pronounced ‘hand’ as ‘and’, and said “an hand.” That’s how bad it sounds when someone says, “An istorical&#8230;”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maeve</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/comment-page-1/#comment-389013</link>
		<dc:creator>Maeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1143#comment-389013</guid>
		<description>jeannine,
H.W.Fowler (Modern English Usage) goes into great detail on the question of the placement of adverbs.
The short version of what he says about the position of an adverb in a compound verb (a verb with one or more auxiliary verbs such as &quot;have&quot;):

&quot;When an adverb is to be used with such a verb, its normal place is between the auxiliary (or sometimes the first auxiliary if there are two or more) and the rest.&quot;

Ergo, nothing wrong with writing &quot;Haphazard immigration policies have historically resulted in...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeannine,<br />
H.W.Fowler (Modern English Usage) goes into great detail on the question of the placement of adverbs.<br />
The short version of what he says about the position of an adverb in a compound verb (a verb with one or more auxiliary verbs such as &#8220;have&#8221;):</p>
<p>&#8220;When an adverb is to be used with such a verb, its normal place is between the auxiliary (or sometimes the first auxiliary if there are two or more) and the rest.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ergo, nothing wrong with writing &#8220;Haphazard immigration policies have historically resulted in&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeannine</title>
		<link>http://www.dailywritingtips.com/a-historic-or-an-historic-event/comment-page-1/#comment-389011</link>
		<dc:creator>jeannine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailywritingtips.com/?p=1143#comment-389011</guid>
		<description>Would appreciate an opinion on the use of the word &quot;historically&quot; as I can not find any information related to its proper use in The Elements of Style or my AP Stylebook. Most people tend to use this word in a split-infinitive manner (i.e., &quot;has historically resulted...&quot;, &quot;that have historically used...&quot;) and I would like to edit this with confidence. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would appreciate an opinion on the use of the word &#8220;historically&#8221; as I can not find any information related to its proper use in The Elements of Style or my AP Stylebook. Most people tend to use this word in a split-infinitive manner (i.e., &#8220;has historically resulted&#8230;&#8221;, &#8220;that have historically used&#8230;&#8221;) and I would like to edit this with confidence. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.dailywritingtips.com @ 2012-02-09 18:37:47 -->
